BlueNC @
Tuesday, May 7, 2013 - 10:13am

The General Assembly has voted to make it possible for people to carry guns anywhere and everywhere ... except in the General Assembly.

Screw that.

gun control
541
James @
Monday, May 6, 2013 - 8:42pm

Any person who's paying attention understands that the Republican super-majority in Raleigh is unjust, immoral, and probably illegal. As is the Republican-dominated Congressional delegation. How can it be otherwise? More than half of North Carolina voters cast their ballots for Democrats and we still ended up with 9 Republican representatives and only 4 Democrats. Something is horribly wrong.

Fortunately, most North Carolinians have awakened to this outrage and are in favor of nonpartisan redistricting. There is even bipartisan action in the General Assembly moving in that direction.

Which raises one critical question: By when?

Bipartisan redistricting should be happening now so that new districts are in place for the 2016 elections.

If the General Assembly has time to ban nipples and declare whirlygigs to be our official state folk art, then surely they have time to implement honest, nonpartisan redistricting over the next three years.

North Carolina's current redistricting scheme violates basic principles of representative democracy. The resulting government is illegitimate, as are the laws passed by this government. The super-majority in Raleigh today deserves neither our respect nor our cooperation.

Reverend Barber and the NAACP have it right. They are protesting an immoral and unjust government. Civil disobedience is the least we can do.

433
Monday, May 6, 2013 - 3:53pm

NC NOW (National Organization for Women)
Wed., May 15, 2013, Noon – 2:00 pm NC4
ERA ALERT

After more than 40 years, North Carolina will walk back onto the historical stage with an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) Action coming on the heels of Mother’s Day.

Join us on Wed., May 15, 2013, Noon – 2:00 pm, on the grounds of the NC Legislative Bldg. for a vigil - “Simple Justice, Long Overdue”

381
Monday, May 6, 2013 - 12:26pm

Taking food away from families to build up a surplus:

She says North Carolina got itself into this mess by giving tax breaks to employers, and argues that it's unfair to fix the situation "solely on the backs of the unemployed." But Republican Sen. Bob Rucho says "there were no easy solutions" for dealing with a debt to the federal government in excess of $2.5 billion. He says his plan will allow the state to pay off its debt to Washington three years earlier, while also building up a billion-dollar trust fund for the next recession.

I got news for you, Einstein: when the foreclosures start rolling in from all the families who are financing your heartless scheme, the housing market will crash again, and the next recession will be here before you can replace the batteries in your calculator. But don't listen to me, why not ask some of your real estate buddies?

341
James @
Monday, May 6, 2013 - 11:05am

Received via email ... something I wish I had written.

Five questions.

News reports in and around North Carolina government, politics and the General Assembly seem to raise more questions than answers. Here are some questions. Perhaps the search for the answers or the answers themselves, might be enlightening. In no particular order:

  • Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers said Thursday: “I support the renewable energy portfolio standard.” Ivan Urlaub, head of the N.C. Sustainable Energy Association, supports it. The Sierra Club supports it. These folks often represent polar opposites on energy issues. If they agree on this, who is providing the juice behind efforts to repeal it?
  • The state’s Medicaid shortfall will be $248 million -- $135 million more than initially estimated -- because of a “forecasting error” dating from Gov. Bev Perdue’s administration? Specifically what was the error? Might it have been that someone forgot to adjust the formula when Gov. McCrory decided to reject participation in Obamacare – and lost the federal funding that was in the initial formula?
  • Is it appropriate for politicians who received campaign money from a sweepstakes operator facing criminal charges, to then make donations – in similar amounts to those donations – to charities as a way to distance themselves from the contributor? Aren’t these politicians still accepting the questionable donations? Is it appropriate for charities to accept funds that come from a tainted source? Why not just send the money back to the donor?
  • Why would it be necessary to require drug testing to receive some state benefits, such as income assistance, when no drug testing is required for other benefits, such as a concealed to carry handgun permit?
  • If state leaders believe they can come up with $49 million to put surveillance cameras on 14,000 buses that take kids to and from public schools each day, why can’t it come up with funds to keep teaching assistants in classrooms?
BlueNC
508
BlueNC @
Monday, May 6, 2013 - 7:45am

The destruction of public education and the practice of corporate bribes continue to attract editorial interest. Voters will ultimately decide whether giving $100 million to a very profitable insurance company while firing school teachers is a proper choice. Lots more below the fold.

Daily dose
394
BlueNC @
Sunday, May 5, 2013 - 6:07pm

To all the outsiders, insiders, upsiders and downsiders, here's some inspiration worth a couple of minutes of your time.

Frank Eaton
1,046
Sunday, May 5, 2013 - 10:43am

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain:

There’s an important distinction, however, between spirited debate and character assassination. Republicans don’t favor tax cuts, regulatory reform, energy exploration, or school choice because some shadowy special-interest group has paid them off. Republicans favor these ideas because they believe them to be good public policy.

The thing is, it's not "either or" as John Hood would like his readers to believe. Whether he's referring to ALEC or Art Pope's Civitas/JLF/AFPNC propaganda machine, that "shadowy special interest group" has been engaged in an aggressive education campaign for years, spoon-feeding anti-government fear-mongering parables and arcane and unprovable economic fantasy scenarios to potential GOP candidates and their supporters, while dangling the prize of $4,000 checks from the Pope family bundlers if they have the free-market Kool-Aid stain on their lips. Here's one of the many ways to get that stain:

514
James @
Sunday, May 5, 2013 - 10:18am

From a comment found on Facebook, responding to McCrory's insistence that North Carolina government should be replaced by a smartphone:

Except that an important role of government is to undertake exactly those tasks that fail to lend themselves to efficiency (like national defense), or to those tasks, that if done in the most efficient way are not fair to all citizens (like environmental or financial regulation). Unless, maybe McCrory's point was that government should be done badly whenever possible, so everyone will agree to eliminating it.

It's easy to lose sight of first principles like these when fundamental rights are being stripped away each and every day. Caught between such rocks and hard places, many people simply give up, assuming that the system is so corrupt and rigged that nothing can really be done. That's why we need to start a new conversation about the proper role of government in our state. As we think through all the many considerations, I am absolutely confident of one thing: The proper role of government is NOT to arrest citizens for protesting the illegitimate and unconstitutional actions of the North Carolina General Assembly.

Sunday thinking
434
Syndicate content