Alcoa lies

From Carter Wrenn, via Ed Cone, an excellent summary of the aftershocks of Alcoa-gate. Note to self: Whenever a multinational corporation promises they're telling the truth, it is safe to assume they're lying.

By the time Ms. Vajda finished playing her documentary Alcoa had gone from a victim of Socialism to a corporate villain. And, off balance, Alcoa stumbled again.

Alcoa Vice President William O’Rourke stood up and asked Senator Hartsell if he could have his say and, as soon as he finished telling how much Alcoa loved trees and wildlife and rivers, a Senator asked him if Alcoa had ever done any studies of kidney and bladder cancer rates among its employees.

No, O’Rourke said.

Alcoa’s chickens come home to roost two days later when a Deputy Attorney General, after reading a transcript of the hearing, fired off an email to Senator Hartsell saying he had copies of two studies Alcoa had conducted into kidney cancer rates at its smelters and one of them had Mr. O’Rourke’s name on it so he didn’t see how Mr. O’Rourke’s testimony could be what he called ‘factual.’

Alcoa’s credibility which had hit rock bottom dropped again and Senator Hartsell’s bill (with a provision included about cleaning up Alcoa’s pollution) sailed through the State House with every Democrat and over half the Republicans voting for it.

So Alcoa which earns more each year than the entire state government of North Carolina was undone because a State Senator played a blonde Hungarian anchorwoman’s documentary for a Senate Committee on a Tuesday night.

Share on Facebook

More twists than a pretzel

Comments from the reporter at the center of the storm, via Laura Leslie.

Initially I feel ALCOA welcomed my interest in the issues surrounding the Yadkin Relicensing, I had seen plenty of Gene Ellis and lobbyists for both sides down at the Legislative building during my weekly coverage when they are in session, but after asking probing questions during the ALCOA interview things began to change and over the coming months I felt an immense weight from all sides and the growing facts weighing on me regarding this story.

I'm rethinking my views on the journalism debate around this story (the subpoena from the General Assembly, the compliance by UNC-TV) ... but am still of two minds.

You know what I find

incomprehensible about this story? That amid all this (justifiable) indignation over Alcoa's previous bad behavior, those very same Senators would turn around and exempt future polluters from SEPA.

That "righteous indignation" can apparently be turned on and off like a water hose.

Righteous indignation

or, more accurately, the pretense at having any sense of righteousness coming from some of these politicians is stomach turning to witness. "Righteous Indignation" for so very many of them means passing a law with a great sense of righteousness and then getting indignant when state agencies try to actually enforce them.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
-Edmund Burke

It's always the lies that bring them down

and the furor they make over something that probably wouldn't be noticed by more than a handful of people if it weren't for their protestations.

Progressives are the true conservatives.

What a fun story...

And from Carter Wrenn, that wonderful guy. Who'da thunk it???

Besta é tu se você não viver nesse mundo
http://zabouti.tumblr.com