Any health care reform we can get
that isn't as stupid as the shrub's plan is all right with me. I've plugged Verla Insko's Health Care for All bill, and the National Health Insurance Act (HR 676), and cheered almost any reform idea that comes along, because any step in the right direction is a start.
In an opinion piece that came out today, Phil Mattera of the Corporate Research Project asks,
"Why are we keeping a hopeless, for-profit health insurance system alive?"
You can read and comment on his article here.
Mattera opines on what each of several political figures want to do about health care reform, but basically all he says about John Edwards is that Edwards wants to tax the upper class to help the uninsured. I think Mattera has overlooked the most important features of what John Edwards is proposing to do, and how it could lead to phasing out private insurance companies' involvement with health care. Edwards recognizes that it's just not politically viable for us to jump straight to National Health (a la the United Kingdom or Canada). At this point in time, the insurance lobby is just not going to let fully nationalized health care happen, and Edwards knows that. What he calls for is to have both at the same time; consumers[I hate that word] people can individually choose between private health insurance or public health insurance, but everyone will be required to have one or the other. Because public health, like Medicare, will be more efficient, the insurance companies, in competition with public health, will have to streamline, tighten up, and (though Edwards doesn't say) accept more modest profits. Edwards sees this as a good way to transition, and his vision beyond is that eventually the people will vote on whether to keep a dual system or go fully to National Health. (It'll be a no-brainer.)
I like John Edwards' idea; it's savvy enough that it might actually get implemented in the near term. The insurance companies will still object, but not as vehemently as they would otherwise; they'll have time to get used to tightening their belts, and time to prepare their somewhat dignified but inglorious exit from health care.
John Edwards is the only Democratic presidential candidate with an RSS feed, and that should tell you something. Now if he will only tell me where he stands on corporate media conglomeration, and how we're going to get real issues and information out to the masses instead of truthiness and infotainment, I might just vote for him.
BlueNC is dedicated to making North Carolina a more progressive and prosperous state. If your intention is to disrupt this effort, please find somewhere else to express your opinions.
Like?


Comments
Back door national healthcare
I heard someone describe it that way. While I wish that EVERY dem would stand in unison repeating "You already pay for national healthcare, you just don't get it", I don't think that will happen. So, we fight for universal health care.
Where are the candidates?
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
Isn't THAT the Truth -
"You already pay for national healthcare, you just don't get it",
That about sums it up. Everybody pays but only some people get to use it.
Robert, I admire you.
I admit I'm a greenhorn here. I've gone back over a lot of your blogs and comments about health care. I've just now read Why Obama, Hillary, Edwards, Romney etc. Don't Support Single Payer. I understand, at last. Universal, single-payer health care is what we should be advocating. None of the candidates support it except Kucinich. That doesn't matter. By advocating, pushing for universal single-payer health care, we are keeping them all honest.
I really love Kucinich. He stands for everything I believe in. He doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being president right now. That didn't stop me from supporting him up to the primary vote in 2004. Unelectability didn't stop me from being a Naderite in years past. Hell, I even placed a write-in vote for Pat Paulsen, that time he ran as a joke. I'm not a True Believer in the two-party system, and I would prefer we had a legislature apportioned among multiple parties, and the ability to recall the president with a vote of no confidence. And I love underdogs. Underdog was my favorite super cartoon character when I was a kid.
But I'm tired of Democrats losing because of lack of party unity. I would support Heath Shuler for president if he could beat the Republicans. If my vote for Kucinich would let Hillary beat Edwards, I'd be damned ashamed of myself, because I don't see Hillary as a populist candidate, I see her as part of the Machine. Edwards, and his health care plan, may not be all we want. But I'm convinced he is more electable than any other Democrat. I'm good with that, even though in my ideal world, Kucinich would win by a landslide.
I like having a candidate in the race who pushes.
It's good to have someone pushing Progressive issues, someone pulling the country to the left after so many years of being pulled to the right. But, I would rather have someone like Bernie Sanders, who I heard on NPR today, than Dennis Kucinich. Heck, I even like having Nader around to TALK about it, but after Florida in 2000, I'd throttle anyone who voted for him today : )
Given all that, UHC is not my only issue, and John Edwards lines up best for me when it comes to ALL the issues.
Glad to have you here!
Where are the candidates?
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
So you're the one
I stole that from, Robert! On another thread, I said we already pay for universal health care, we just don't get it! Anyway, it's absolutely true.