parmea @
Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 5:37pm

Thanks senior representatives for requiring North Carolinians to have to fight our own US Navy.

NO OLF OLF
1,244
parmea @
Wednesday, March 26, 2008 - 7:31pm

Please do not look to me for help

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr on Wednesday reiterated his support for area counties opposed to a Navy jet training field in eastern North Carolina.

But North Carolina's junior U.S. senator also said there is nothing he or fellow North Carolina Sen. Elizabeth Dole can do to remove the sites in Camden County and Gates County from the Navy's shortlist of possible locations for the airfield.

NO OLF OLF
1,316
parmea @
Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - 9:05pm

U.S. House axes Washington County OLF site.

"The House has taken the Washington County site off the table because it posed a danger to the community, pilots and aircraft," wrote Butterfield, a Democrat from Wilson. "This is a clear message that if the Navy wants to move forward with an OLF it must have the support of the community."

Now we have all 4 big boys saying the Navy needs to have local support before moving forward with their OLF site!

The roster of elected officials opposed to this OLF or stating local support is required:
Camden County board of commissioners
Gates County board of commissioners
Perquimans County board of commissioners
Washington County board of commissioners


Frontpaged by A . . . a much better report than what I wrote. Thanks, Parmea.

OLF US Navy
1,347
parmea @
Thursday, November 29, 2007 - 9:29pm

Floating flight deck

“You can make it as big as you want,” Khachaturian said in a telephone interview Tuesday. “If what the Navy needs is 2,000 acres, there is no question that is a possibility.”

The proposal may be cost prohibitive. The acre-sized components cost from $20 million to $30 million each, depending on how much weight they are designed to support. Two thousand such components would therefore run the Navy from about $40 billion to $60 billion.

The estimated cost to acquire land and construct the facilities needed for an OLF on land is $231 million, according to the Navy’s draft environmental impact statement released in February.

Once built, the platform could be moored to the sea bed with cables. Computers could be used to position the platform or move it to different locations, Khachaturian said. The system floats optimally in water 1,000 feet deep or more, Khachaturian said.

Frontpaged and embellished (with the photograph) by Anglico. This image is from the company Versabuoy that produces floating platforms. It's very cool stuff. Check out their site.

OLF US Navy
1,075
parmea @
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 5:13pm

The Navy cannot, I repeat cannot perform 2 air wings worth of training in a two week period. Because of this we must build a second OLF to augment Fentress so air wing training can be accomplished in this time frame. OOOh wait, my bad, they can accomplish this training in a 5 day period .... I return you to your normal BlueNC reading. Sorry to have scared you so.

But we still want our second OLF.

OLF US Navy
1,656
parmea @
Sunday, October 7, 2007 - 10:26am

So who actually proposed the six new sites for further study in the continuing saga of the OLF in Northeast North Carolina.

Was it the Navy? DENR? Governor Easely's office? the Man on the moon?

OLF US Navy
754
parmea @
Tuesday, September 25, 2007 - 8:22pm

Former Oceana CO: Fentress may satisfy OLF needs
September 25th, 2007

Captain Skip Zobel says he understands the Navy's desire to construct a new outlying field somewhere, but until that day comes, if ever, Zobel says Fentress could certainly do the job.

According to the video news video, the Navy would have to move some training flights to a different field and fix the flight path altitudes at Fentress and the problem is solved.

Capt Zobel was in charge at some time of Oceana and knows the requirements of Oceana, Fentress and the fleet. His statements hold water and are smart.

What he is saying is for the Navy to use the assets at their disposal now. Fix the problems that is causing the Navy's desire to explore an OLF elsewhere.

OLF US Navy
862
parmea @
Saturday, September 22, 2007 - 12:06pm

Please ooo please take this and please paste it on your mirror so every morning when you wake up and get dressed you see it.

NORTH CAROLINA DOES NOT NEED TO SUPPORT THIS OLF PROCESS. NO COUNTY IN NORTH EAST NORTH CAROLINA WANTS THIS.

Repeat this as often as you wish.

Virginia Pilot. regarding the newly revealed sites in North Carolina.

It's certainly a positive step, but it's got to be a site that is comfortable ... and is approved by the people of North Carolina. I look forward to learning about the viability of these sites.

Senator Dole, I will give you credit, at least you have said something about these sites. Senator Burr, where areeeeeeeeeee yooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuu? MIA again.

OLF US Navy
806
parmea @
Friday, September 21, 2007 - 10:24pm

When a representative for a community fails to protect his constituants but rather protects the people of another state at the expense of his own, then he needs to be called out for this action.

Mikey, you are not giving us in NE NC a warm fuzzy that you care about us. Please prove me wrong.

859
parmea @
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 7:49pm

Went to the meeting for the OLF selection in Raleigh and got a few tidbits of information:

Adm. Anderson stated that if there was not a house within 100 miles of Oceana and Fentress he would still need this second OLF for Oceana. Encroachment around Oceana is not impacting the operation at the site.

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, Adm. Anderson might want to look at the 2005 BRAC. Encroachment is bad enough that the abandonment of a mission has been called for.

Cherry Point does not need an OLF. Cherry Point can perform all the FCLPs needed by the Navy squadrons assigned. If it becomes necessary, the planes can just fly to Oceana and or Fentress.

OLF US Navy
769