On Cutting Dealerships, Or, We Examine The Costs Of Selling Cars
So there’s a lot of conversation out there about car dealerships being told they won’t be selling cars for Chrysler and GM any more.
The idea, we are told, is to save the auto manufacturers money by reducing the number of dealerships with whom they do business.
I don’t really know that much about the car business; and I really didn’t understand where these cost savings would come from, but I was able to have a conversation with the one person I do know who actually could offer some useful insight.
Follow along, Gentle Reader, and you’ll get a bit of an education at a time when we all need to know a bit more about these companies we suddenly seem to own…and about the closure of thousands of local businesses that will make the news about our bad job market worse.
We know, at the moment, that Chrysler wants to close more or less 800 of its 3181 dealerships, and that the list of dealerships was disclosed as part of the company’s bankruptcy filing. The dealer relationships with Chrysler are expected to end June 9.
We also know that GM intends to end relationships with at least 1100 dealers. That list has not been publicly disclosed, and the dealer relationships are not scheduled to end until after the end of the 2010 “model year”, in October of 2010.
It is anticipated that GM will eventually cut 2600 dealers from its current network in an effort to get down to about 3600 dealers; suggesting a second round of cuts is yet to come.
(It appears that Ford is seeking to cut sales costs by about $600,000,000 annually while not cutting the number of dealerships.)
In order to protect the innocent, I’m not going to name my source for this story, nor the dealer for whom he works. For our purposes, let’s refer to him as the “dealer rep”.
So the first thing the dealer rep told me is that many of the dealers affected are “midlevel” dealers who operate in a market with several other nearby dealers; closing these dealers will hopefully reduce costs without substantially reducing overall sales in those markets.
He reports that it costs GM about $250,000 a year to support each midlevel dealer.
The costs include providing unique tools to dealers, providing training to dealer personnel, and advertising and promotional expenses.
I’m told that these are “co-op” costs, with dealers also paying a portion of the same expenses…but GM’s share, multiplied by every 1,000 midlevel dealers removed from the rolls, equals a $250,000,000 annual savings for GM.
He also tells me that many of the dealers are located in rural markets and sell a relatively small number of cars. For these dealers, there is the additional cost of having to deliver vehicles on partially empty transport trucks (or as the dealer rep put it: they’re getting paid less for the delivery than it costs to actually make the delivery).
If we assume that GM spends only 30% of that $250,000 spent annually on midlevel dealer support for these dealers, each 1000 dealers cut saves about $85,000,000 per year; if they spend 60%, the savings is about $170,000,000.
Add it up, and the potential savings for GM might be in the range of $400-500,000,000. Chrysler might expect to save roughly a third of that amount…but that would assume the composition of dealers, and the money spent, is about the same as for the GM dealer group.
(Here’s a quick bit of gossip that I have not confirmed through a second source: the dealer rep told me that some GM dealers are being cut not for lack of sales, but as a result of “customer service” issues.)
There is another group of dealers who will be cut “through attrition”. These include Pontiac dealers, who already know there will be no more Pontiacs to sell, and Saab dealers, who know they won’t be part of the GM future. There are also dealers who are (and have been) closing because of the general economy.
Hummer and Saturn dealers currently face an unknown future.
Something else you should know: the dealer rep told me that Chrysler filed for bankruptcy before terminating the dealer relationships, which may give those dealers more rights in a bankruptcy proceeding than GM dealers that were notified before any bankruptcy filing.
He suggested such a filing might occur as soon as the second week in June…but that is also something I did not confirm through a second source.
He also points out that the successful outcome of all of this is that the two companies are able to make the same sales goals as before with fewer dealers…and he has no idea whether that will come to pass or not.
As for options: the dealer rep reports that the one manufacturer seeking dealers today is Hyundai; but even if they became Hyundai dealers, a lot of stores—particularly in rural areas—are not going to be as successful selling Hyundais as they were selling Chevy, GMC, or Dodge trucks…which might turn out to be good news for Ford and Toyota.
So what have we learned?
GM and Chrysler could save substantial amounts of money by reducing dealers; that process is underway…and for some number of dealers, it’s not about sales volume as much as it’s about sales practices.
GM and Chrysler hope that they can sell the same number of cars with fewer dealers, but as of today there is no way to be sure if that will come true or not.
The biggest winners in this process might be the surviving dealers, or the Ford and Toyota dealers with whom the closed dealers are no longer competing.
The employees of nearly 3000 dealers—and the cities in which they are located--are unlikely to end up winners in this process; however, some (such as mechanics) might eventually find work at the surviving dealerships.
Finally, I apologize for the fact that this wasn’t as inspiring a story as we like to present in this space…but now that we are basically the owners of two major auto manufacturers, it’s a set of facts and figures we better get to know.
WARNING—Self-promotion ahead: I am competing for a Netroots Nation scholarship, and I was not selected in the first round of voting. There are two more chances to be selected, and the voting has restarted from scratch…so even if you’ve done so before, I still have to ask you to stop by the Democracy for America site and click on the “Add your support” link to offer your support for me again. Thanks for your patience, and we now return you to your regular programming.
- fake consultant's blog
- 1207 reads











just a little bit of insight...
...you might not have considered before.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
Thanks fake
Will get right on that DFA vote as soon as they send me another login. Siiiiigh. Yes, I was the one who had to reset my password the last time. I did such a good job of picking a pw that was secret that I've kept it from myself.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
oops...
...but i've done it more than a few times myself.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
I bet the password is
gardening-related, Betsy.
Try "sprout" or "irrigate" or "manure". Or maybe "dehydrated" or "disgusted" or "sunburned" or "lumbar strain".
Sorry. That's probably not helping...
The world’s largest
The world’s largest automaker, General Motors, is facing financial troubles. This financial problem is actually a sign of larger problems to come facing their Asian rivals. They and Chrysler asked for cash advance loans from the Government back in November, along with a request for open lines of credit from Ford. GM Stock has recently taken a huge tumble on the market, after President Obama asked CEO Rick Wagoner to step down from his post as the head of GM and all subsidiaries, which he promptly complied with. Some experts have advocated that both GM and Chrysler declare bankruptcy and merge, with both discarding all brands that aren't competitive. Regardless, it appears dark days are still ahead for General Motors.
there are a lot of external problems...
...that are hurting gm, as well as problems in the us market.
chrysler is worse.
to paraphrase: "if it weren't for pickup trucks they'd have no luck at all". (in fairness, they do also still move jeeps...).
but you should keep in mind that the recent dealer closures will cost us 150,000 jobs or more, and taking out 25% of the gm and chrysler businesses might cost 1-1.5 million more jobs.
that's equal to two years of layoffs a la 2008, and that's a hit to the economy that is really gonna hurt.
there may be a case to be made that another round of economic stimulus would be cheaper than forced mergers, over the long run.
here's what i mean: if you lose 1 million jobs, and each displaced worker gets $15,000 in unemployment benefits, that one cost would be a $15 billion expense--and that will not be the only cost of losing a million jobs.
so...would i rather pay $15 billion in unemployment...or buy $15 billion in police and fire and life safety vehicles for government use?
all that said, before gm, ford, or chrysler (or toyota or subaru or nissan or bmw...speaking of us automakers) can recover the larger economy must recover, and that is most assuredly not yet in full swing.
a final point: there may be a "third way forward". see this link.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965