A different kind of Senator: One that truly represents North Carolina

Democratic County Conventions are being held today all across North Carolina. Unfortunately, despite his super-human capabilities, Ken can't make it to all of them. He has asked that the following letter be read to convention-goers on his behalf. Read it. Share it. Make sure progress has a voice in this year's election:


Dear North Carolina Democrats,

I come from a very different place than the senators serving today. My grandmother was born in 1893, on a plantation in Person County. She was taught to read and write by her children and lived to be 100 years old. Even though her own mother had been a slave, my grandmother believed deeply in the promise of America as the land of opportunity. Now, her grandchild seeks to represent North Carolina in the U.S. Senate to make real on that promise, and to secure a future where all Americans have the opportunity to realize their full potential.

I’m not like other candidates. I washed dishes, cleaned toilets, served French fries, and drove a bus to put myself through Duke University and Harvard Law School. When I get to Washington D.C., I’ll be a different kind of senator—a senator that understands and represents the needs of our state and people.

After graduation, I came back to North Carolina to work to improve communities across the state. I started my own firm because I wanted to provide affordable legal services to entreprenurs and small-businesses. I’ve worked with small and large companies, state and local governments, and non-profit organizations. I’ve worked with businesses in nearly every industry in North Carolina to create jobs and expand economic opportunity. This is not just a campaign issue for me. I’ve spent my entire career helping to create jobs and spur economic growth. I know what it will take to get our economy back on track.

In 2008, Barack Obama inspired us to believe that change was possible. For the first time in a long time our politics reflected our hopes and nor our fears, our dreams and not our differences, and the promise of our future rather than the old, tired limitations of our past. But over the past year we have seen that change does not come easy to Washington D.C. Republican leaders like Sarah Palin use ‘Change’ as a punch line. And Richard Burr, doing the work of big business and putting partisan politics above the interest of the people, has transformed himself into the new Senator “No.”

We can’t beat Richard Burr by simply attempting to replace one career politician with another. We won’t change the U.S. Senate by sending another politician to Washington that is already bought and paid for. This year, in this election, we need a new kind of experience, and a new kind of leadership.

That’s why I am asking Democrats to stand with me in this campaign. Together let’s write the next great chapter in the history of North Carolina. Let’s make North Carolina a leading light, moving this country forward, and securing the promise of opportunity and prosperity for all.

God bless you and God bless the great State of North Carolina.

Ken Lewis

Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate

Share on Facebook

Holly gave a strong reading to the

letter. It was one of the most passionate and optimistic speeches in overall tone that I heard today at the OCDP Convention.

OCDP?

Elaborate, please....mostly what it is and what it stands for..Thanks.

Orange County Democratic

Orange County Democratic Party

Appreciate that, Bruce

Explains many things.

Good deal.

Fine speech, but does he have to slam fellow Democrats?

You can bet the "bought and paid for" line will be used by the GOP against Cunningham or Marshall, should one of them win instead of Lewis, which I think is likely.

There is too much of this going on this race, not just from Lewis, although I heard nothing at all at the OCDP convention yesterday from either Marshall or Cunningham, both of whom spoke, about their Dem opponents, but maybe I missed it.

By the way, I am truly undecided and could vote for any of the three major candidates here.

There is sniping all around

but it seems reasonably subdued.

Each candidate is looking to break out, to get on the radar screen in a positive way. But all the other noise (health care, Tom Fetzer's shenanigans, Burr's lame stunts) seems to be making people tune out.

Let's watch and see who handles the Supreme Court situation most deftly. The next Senate will decide whether Stevens' replacement will be a thoughtful, compassionate human being or a flawed compromise.

I agree

when you are running for political office without a background of holding political office, pushing the idea of electing someone from a non-office background is pretty much par for the course.

Things could have gotten really ugly during this primary, and I don't feel they have. I'm sure they'll be a little heat at the debate to, but all in all I think this primary season has stayed fairly clean. While us politicos might know every last detail, I don't think anything negative has really gotten out to the level of public consciousness. And overall its been a job well done.

Why speak of the other candidates at all in a primary?

You can say what you stand for in a primary without even mentioning your opponents, much less saying they are "bought and paid for." That is pretty tough charge and when I heard Mrs. Lewis say that yesterday at the OCDP convention where she read her husband's letter, I certainly wasn't happy about it. It is obvious he is a different kind of candidate than the other 2 major candidates, but he made that point very well and very positively even without the "bought and paid for" line, so why throw it in?

It sure left a bad taste in my mouth. I certainly wouldn't rule him out for this and I am really undecided, but it doesn't help him get my vote.

I disagree Jake

Why would you think it could have gotten really ugly? What is there to get ugly about? They all pretty much agree on the issues. I know I could support any of them enthusicatically no matter who my primary choice is. I don't see how they could have gotten ugly personally either: all seem upstanding, honest candidates and again I would be proud to support any of them for Senate.

And although I did not like the "bought and paid for" line, I wouldn't call it "ugly" just gratuitous.

Well, then...

"Ugly"..."Gratuitous"..c'mon. A rose by any other name is still a rose, so the saying goes. I'm no Cal fan and favor Elaine for sure, but let's look a what is really being said here.