On Fighting To Win, Or, A Tale Of Two Kinds Of Democrats
If your view of politics is filtered by a lens marked “Progressive” or “Liberal”, there’s a pretty good chance that you’ve been gnashing your teeth and pulling your hair in frustration over the “give away the store, then negotiate” approach professional Democrats have used when facing the challenges from the Tea Party last year, and all that’s come after.
Over and over and over people like me have written stories wondering why Democrats, starting with this President, don’t get out in a very public way and slam Republican policies, over and over and over—especially when most Americans hate the things Republicans seem to love to support.
Turning over Government to the highest bidder?
Not so popular.
Going back to a heathcare system run by, for, and of the insurance industry?
Again, not so much.
Jacking up taxes and healthcare costs for you and me in order to provide another trillion in tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires?
So unpopular pollsters hardly believe it.
But there is another way, and today’s story is in two parts: we’re going to talk about how hard it is to get Democrats, as a group, to get loud and get aggressive—and then we’re going to talk about Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, who is out there showing any reluctant Democrat just exactly how you can “grow the brand”.
We are, all, North and South, engaged in the White Slave Trade, and he who succeeds best, is esteemed most respectable. It is far more cruel than the Black Slave Trade, because it exacts more of its slaves, and neither protects nor governs them. We boast, that it exacts more, when we say, "that the profits made from employing free labor are greater than those from slave labor." The profits, made from free labor, are the amount of the products of such labor, which the employer, by means of the command which capital or skill gives him, takes away, exacts or "exploitates" from the free laborer. The profits of slave labor are that portion of the products of such labor which the power of the master enables him to appropriate. These profits are less, because the master allows the slave to retain a larger share of the results of his own labor, than do the employers of free labor.
--From the book “Cannibals All!”, by George Fitzhugh, 1857
So let’s start with the “how hard is it?” part:
I get to participate in conference calls these days, and I was recently on a call with a Member of Congress who shall remain nameless (to protect the moderately guilty). The Member was unable to remain on the call until my question, but I was able to get an email off to the press rep over there, who was kind enough to get back to me.
After an exchange of emails, we got down to the real question:
How should I explain to readers why they don't hear every Democrat saying something like this, every single day: "We get that there's a financing problem in the future, and the good news that it can be fixed without raising the retirement age, and without cutting benefits, and we can even lower the payroll tax rate at the same time--and that's why we will never let the Republicans destroy Social Security, even under cover of a budget fight"?
Now I post on almost 30 blog sites, from Kos to Docudharma to Left In Alabama to The Bilerico Project, and all sorts of others in between, and if there is one theme that is consistent across all these sites, it's that readers do not understand why so many Democrats, over and over, don't avail themselves of the obvious political advantages that are there to be had when they get in front of the public and, well, frankly, act like Democrats?
So that was the question I sent…and it’s a good thing I didn’t hold my breath waiting for an answer, because that answer never came.
I sent the same question to the office of a very liberal Member with whom I’ve had good relations in the past—and again, nothing.
Here’s another “what does it take to get Democrats to act like Democrats?” story:
I was in Olympia, Washington, on April 8th for a big ol’ labor rally, and the featured speaker was Senator Spencer Coggs (he’s one of the 14 Democratic State Senators who left Wisconsin to make Scott Walker’s life a whole lot less comfortable), and he tore up the crowd pretty good…but there was at least a couple of hours of speakers, and the event was held right in front of the State Capitol, and the (Democratically controlled) Legislature was in session, right at that very moment…and the (Democratically occupied) Governor’s Mansion is literally right next door…and yet, somehow, not one single elected official of the Democratic persuasion from anywhere in the entire State of Washington could manage to find their way past the kids ringing bells under the Dome and out the front door to greet the thousands of voters standing just outside.
OK, so that’s the problem—but as you know, I like to offer solutions as well, and with that in mind, it’s time to meet the Governor of Montana, Brian Schweitzer.
Now, as you might imagine, Montana is not exactly a haven for lefty liberals, but Schweitzer, a Democrat, is not only not caving under pressure…he’s showing Democrats everywhere how to send a message—and how to send it with style.
The Republican-led Legislature passed a slew of bills he didn’t like (he reported that none of ‘em created new jobs—and doesn’t that sound familiar?), and he could have given in and signed them—or he could follow the advice of Denny Lester, ace political cartoonist for the Helena (MT) “Independent Record”, and veto the hell out of those bills, preferably with a branding iron.
There is a Montana Department of Livestock, and if you intend to register a new cattle brand, they are the folks you need to see—and sure enough, on February 23rd, an “Official Brand Certificate” was issued to the Governor for the brand “VETO”.
Then the Governor went out and created a job in Montana: he had a series of branding irons made, each carrying the new brand in various sizes (“calf”, “yearling”, and “bull”, depending on how much he wanted to veto any particular bill).
“…so my Mom called to find out if there was a branding going on, and I said well, not really, it’s a sort of a branding, and she said, uh, do you need somebody to bring the beer?...”
--Governor Brian Schweitzer, April 13, 2011
The Governor got a few friends together last Wednesday, and he vetoed not one, not two, but 17 bills he felt were “either frivolous, unconstitutional or in direct contradiction to the expressed will of the people of Montana”…and he did it, with the cameras rolling, by using the branding irons to brand a red-hot “VETO” on those bills, all to the cheers of the assembled crowd.
You can see it for yourself, right here, in a video produced by the Montana Democratic Party—and trust me when I tell you, it’s a hoot:
Now if you watched that video, you might be thinking: “Hey, maybe that guy should be President…”—and that’s how we get to the real point of this story.
We have in front of us a President and a Democratic Party apparatus who can either negotiate with Republicans who want to kill both Social Security and Medicare (the likely end result being two programs and a Democratic Party that will basically be “circling the drain” from then on)…or they can take the branding iron to Paul Ryan’s “Catfood Plan v 2.0” and a lot of other Republican ideas besides, and they can help their own Party and make every Republican in the country feel the burn, all at the same time.
Since negotiating away Medicare and Social Security is hugely unpopular…that’s pretty much what I expect far too many Democrats to do, unless we can grab ‘em by the lapels and show ‘em that voters want Democratic Democrats—you know, the kind of Democrat who understands how to grow a brand, and how to keep it strong, and how to set fire to bad ideas, loudly and publicly, when that’s the right thing to do.
Tell your Member of Congress about this video, and your President, too; and let’s see if we can show our elected “followers” how to get on the road to becoming elected ”leaders”.







if this can work in western montana...
...i'll bet it can also work for democrats in western nc...
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
Fake, I agree with what you've said.
I also think you're spitting into the wind. No offense...I just think we're already screwed. The "establishment" apparently has a tenacious grip on the pocketbooks of a majority of our elected representatives and what "we the people" want is of no concern to these mostly bloviating liars. People who actually speak for the people lose. The establishment sees to it. Witness Alan Grayson (FL).
I think there's a good chance the Social Security thingy is a bait and switch. About the time the Dems are ready to capitulate the public will be screaming...so the GOP in a gesture of conciliation will suggest leaving it alone but privatizing it...so their greedy benefactors can get their hands on the money and squander it...as Bush and his tribe of moral pygmies tried to do....they win BIG...we lose everything....over a few years.
Good answers to many of our problems are known. I can name a handful of easily implementable solutions without even breaking a sweat that would put this nation back on track to a better and more secure future. If I can do that, surely our representatives can. So, why don't they do it? See above. Plus, Washington, including Obama, apparently lacks the courage to fight. There are no "the man in the arena" people in Congress. Well, maybe Bernie Sanders...
Here are my "we can do it" solutions...
1. Tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income.
2. Get out of Afghanistan and Iraq now.
3. Raise the ceiling on SS and Medicare taxes to $200K.
4, Stop all subsidies to "Big Oil" and use the monies to help implement an Alternative Energy Program (mandating 5% of our energy must come from alternative sources in 5 years).
5. Legalize marijuana and control and tax it as we do liquor. Pardon the people in prison on marijuana charges and put them back on the streets with their families so they can be productive and empty our prisons.
6. Declare any credit card interest rate of more than 5% above prime rate to be usurious and illegal.
7. Declare that any publicly owned company paying any executive annually more than 100X the average annual wage of it's non-management employees will be taxed at 70% of Gross Profit.
8. Eliminate the federal pension system for all but our Military. Implement a 401K program using the same rules corporations must follow and severely limit taxpayer contributions to the 401K for any federal employee earning 3X or more of the average annual citizen's income.
I could go on...but what does it matter...it's too simple and the establishment would get angry.
Anyway...I'm glad you have ideas. I've given up. totally.
Stan Bozarth
these are tough times...
...and it can be truly frustrating, but we're back in the world of making promises, and i actually heard obama say today that he can see how raising that tax cap could fix social security...and it's gonna be at least 8 weeks before the mariners are mathematically eliminated from contention...so, yeah: hope springs eternal.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
You know ...
That's a damn fine list.
Environmental Defense Fund
Cell phones will be to the 21st century what tobacco was to the 20th.
Wow, and wow
I can't help agreeing with both of you. We desperately need Dems who can build a fire and a brand and stand up to the establishment, but like Stan said, we're already screwed.
I sometimes float the idea here and there of trying to get some sort of coalition elected from across the spectrum to address one issue and only one issue - wresting control of our electoral politics form the corrupt duopoly currently owned by the super-rich boys and girls club. Every time I do I get laughed out of the room, so I finally just threw up my hands and walked away, Now I'm trying to convince myself it's okay to do that (just walk away) because the war is over, but I'm fast becoming a stubborn old man and I don't like the idea of quitting.
Stan's idea list is great, though personally I'd set the SS/medicare cap at one million dollars or more. No mercy!
Any or all of those ideas WOULD get us going back in the right direction in a big way, but nobody seems willing to even try and find a way around the biggest obstacle of all - corporate control of both parties and access to the electoral process. Until we find a way to fix that very big problem I've resigned myself to the near certainty of a really ugly, bloody future. Don't want it, won't start it, but I don't see any other options. I hope I'm wrong.
Thurman
http://thurmanhubbard.com
"I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority." ~ Elwyn Brooks White
couple thoughts here:
--walking away is hard, if only out of self-defense--and don't forget, this stuff goes in ebbs and flows.
--i do "issue politics" a lot, which is why you see me do so many stories about social security and civil rights, and i would tell you that it's a lot less frustrating than "candidate politics".
"the catch" is that when you're trying to move issues you often need either charismatic leaders to move issues, or you need "traumatic events"; one of those takes you right back to "candidate politics", with all its frustrations, the other requires a ton of patience and the ability to capitalize in a "shock doctrine" kind of way, which is often very hard for "non-professionals" to implement and sustain.
--beyond that, you have to figure out how to make alliances with other like-minded groups; that imposes its own burdens and inefficiencies, but it also creates chances to get very large responses that can "move the politics" in your desired direction, even against large amounts of corporate resources, and we're seeing that in a number of states, including, obviously, wisconsin, and in my own state (washington), where several thousand of us gathered just last week.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965
It ain't too hard
You just gotta play to the crowd. I'd only add that Rep. Anthony Weiner is doing a great job these days. Even the right wing is giving the man some props for getting out in front. How NY Congressman Anthony Weiner Has Managed To Dominate Media In Less Than A Month
Gimmicks are as old as politics yet the party seems to have a tough time even coming up with acceptable props for press conferences. Sigh
gimmicks are great...
...but if you're using gimmicks and playing to the crowd to sell something that has the ring of truth about it, you can do pretty well, and that's where democrats have such a huge advantage: they have a great story to tell, if they would just choose to get out and sell it.
financial regulation? i'd rather be selling the "pro" side than the "keep screwing the average american" side; the same with health care/medicare/medicade, and union rights, and voting rights, and debt and debit and tax cuts...and even guantanamo.
gimmicks can get you free airtime, but you have to have something to sell once you get that airtime, and if you have logic on your side (as the tea party is now discovering), it is possible to change the direction of the argument in a way that advances your causes--but again, you have to actually get out and do it.
"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965