Free as far as practicable?

The N&O does a good job today reporting on The War on Education currently being fought between UNC campuses and We the People.
Seven tuition increases in eight years, including a 71 percent increase for North Carolinians from 1999 to 2004, raise serious questions about whether the UNC system has run afoul of the state's constitutional mandate for free tuition "as far as practicable," says a report by the N.C. Center for Public Policy Research.
I haven't seen the final report, and I don't know much about the NC Center for Public Policy Research, (except for the fact that they need a new website), but the N&O's preview suggests this work is pretty solid. And it certainly doesn't tapdance around the elephants in the room. According to the article, the Center's report:
concludes that the basic structure of public higher education is sound but in need of a tuneup. The study calls on UNC leaders to get better control of big-time college sports and rid the UNC system of rampant political influence.
Given the ethics moratorium passed in Raleigh last month, I don't hold out much hope for either, but I appreciate the Center's calls for sanity.







It's hard to know
exactly how to interpret "free as far as practicable." Wonder what those crazy old founding fathers were thinking when they wrote those weasel words.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
It seems to me there is an elephant and some mice.
I went to a mouse school. It was small, cheap, and worked for me. I now work at the elephant school. I think it would be misguided to pull the reins in on UNC-CH in order to meet the free tuition criteria. UNC-CH already lets a lot of students in from around the state that do not compete with the top talent applying and they have programs in place to help defray the costs of education.
But, facts is facts. UNC-CH has become a world class institute. To give that up would be another example of North Carolina aiming for mediocrity. If anything, UNC should try to create more small schools with highly-paid faculty to try and raise the education level in North Carolina. Not cut tuition at UNC and lead to cuts in services. Or, cut UNC loose and start over with the smaller schools.
In PA, Penn State is offically a state school, but they are run independently. The "state" system includes:
Clarion University (go Golden Eagles!)
Lock Haven University
Millersville University
Slippery Rock University
Bloomsberg University
West Chester University
California University
Indiana University
Shippensburg University
East Stroudsburg University
Mannsfield University
Cheyney Univeristy
Edinboro University
Kutztown University
These Universities are spread throughout the state and serve as commuter schools and centers for specific goals. For instance, one of the schools has a whole program that specializes in nanotechnology and has recieved state and federal funds for that program. Another has an incredible business school that places almost all of its students in good jobs because of its proximity to Philadelphia. And so on.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
Raising tuition is not the answer
to funding woes at UNC and never has been. The problem lies with the NC General Assembly not providing the level of funding that they should. UNC should not have to balance their budget on the backs of its students and their parents.
Tuition is up 71% since 1999. You never see stats for how much tuition is up since 1986 or longer - 20+ years ago - but I am certain it is approaching 500% or more.
UNC doesn't need to charge the tuition that UVA or Michigan charge to be competitive with them. They have little to do with each other. I don't want UNC competing with UVA in a race to see which state can cut university funding faster (and then raise tuition) to satisfy the tax cutting fever of the GOP.
I hope this lawsuit moves forward and that it is successful. Then UNC needs to go back to the legislature and ask for the money thats needed. Fully funding the university system is a critical need for our state, but it should be done by taxpayers, not students.
this reminds me of the whole UNC Hospitals fiasco
Senator Kinnaird is great for standing up and saying that UNC hospital has forgotten its mission and is too profit driven. But, she never mentions that the legislature pays almost NOTHING for the hospital now, whereas it used to pay a boat load. Nor, does she say that funding has been frozen since at least 2000, which amounts to a 10-20% cut in funding depending on inflation stats.
It is much easier to raise tuition at the flagship school than to pass taxes on every resident, from a political point of view. I would much rather pay more taxes to have better comm. college system to attract middle-income jobs.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
As a recent grad from NCST
I always liked that abv. better.
I'll tell you what about tuitition and fees. It does NOT increase the level of intellect at UNC or NCST when COST goes up. This is some sort of odd false truth propentents of costly higher education like to spout.
I come from a single parent family. I put/am putting myself through a undergraduate degree at NC State. I have amassed loan after loan just to "educate" myself to be a better member of society. One that wont work a 9-5 for 50 years with little savings and help into the national economy, which I see many of my drop out friends doing.
However it seems every year I was there, that was the point of higher education at a Top Tier University. Go out get a job and barely get by. Not to mention the loans.
I'm not complaining. I'm in protest over higher rates, 71% in less than 10 years?!, because I worry about our future. My brother and cousin will be attending state schools soon, I hope. And my family's situation hasnt changed at all. So then what? Burden him with an even LARGER load?
I promise you the UNC system is out of control. I hope with Bowles recent appointment to Chairman will help stave off this radical belief that the only way we can compete with other states is by charging more for the education we give out. You want a better education NC? Then YOU help it become a reality. Otherwise you'll get out what you put in.
Thanks for posting this Anglico. What can we do about this? Session's out right?
Be just, and fear not.
Our children need to know that some people fought back, when others collaborated.
UNC Draws More Accolades Today
They were named one of twenty-five new ivy schools.
And despite the increases, it is still one of the better values for state schools.
Case in point:
Davidson College, located in Davidson, N.C., was the only other North Carolina school included in the list
UNC:
$ 2,516.54.....Tuition, Student Activities Fee
4,600.00.....Double
1,475.00.....Meals (full board)
8,591.54.....TOTAL
A $30,000 savings for in-state residents. Don't even get me started on Duke.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
Davidson is tiny
Maybe 2,000 students? 400-500 per class. You could have that many people in one Chemistry 10 class at UNC. My point? The UNC system is educating the masses that will serve NC in the future, while Davidson and Duke educate comparitively few financially elite. The tuition $$ comparison is not an indication of quality. Raising tuition does not raise the quality of the education.
It is the UNC system that turns out the future professionals that serve NC communities, big and small. Doctors, engineers, attorneys, teachers, reasearchers - you name it, the UNC system is turning them out. These positions should not be out of reach of a NC resident who is smart enough - but not wealthy enough - to go to a UNC system school.
How many do you really think are excluded?
How many do you think are really excluded from UNC if they apply themselves. First, there are many more scholarships available at UNC than other public schools, and probably more once lottery money kicks in. Second, I had friends make it through school with no assistance from their parents. They worked, they took out loans, they did what was required to get through.
Now I am not advocating higher tuition, but we should at least take stock of where we are. Which is a great university that is still relativel inexpensive.
I probably paid close to $8000
to go to Clarion in the 80s. That number is ridiculously low. As a matter of fact, here are the rates now for my mediocre little state school:
Per Semester:
$2,453.00.....Tuition
$62.50.....Fees
$80.95.....Fees
$245.30.....Fees
$161.90.....Fees
$95.67.....Fees
$841.00.....Food
$1,782.00.....Room
$5,722.00.....TOTAL
$11,444.62....PER YEAR
Yeah, it costs 2K more to go to my tiny little mediocre state school than it does to attend UNC. Everyone quit bitching about how much UNC costs, you're out of touch with reality.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
System
The term UNC is being used ambiguously to refer to both UNC-CH and the UNC system. A major problem is that UNC-CH and NCSU are consolidating their power at the expense of other universities in the system. They rely on powerful boards, trustees, lobbyists and alumni to perpetuate this power and allocation of resources. I think they are doing a great job for their individual universities but they are doing a disservice to the UNC system as a whole.
I can agree with that.
good point.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
NC Policy Watch
weighs in.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.