Free markets and clean water

When the market extremists get on a binge about environmental planning, they argue that the magic hand of capitalism will eventually do what regulations can't.

The truth is, they're right.

Given enough time, the markets would eventually create a toxic environment that would kill billions of people. No people, no problem.

But "eventually" never comes soon enough to keep those most in need out of harm's way.

At issue now, rules for cleaning up Jordan Lake.

Here are the central facts on the proposed Jordan Lake rules:

#1 - Our population is booming. We already have huge problems with drinking water - witness last year's drought. We simply cannot fail to protect such a precious resource as Jordan Lake.

#2 - It's illogical and unfair to place all of the responsibility for the Jordan clean-up onto new development, wastewater treatment and agriculture. Everyone in the watershed must do their part. The federal Clean Water Act also makes this clear.

#3 - Much of the pollution emanating from our cities comes from storm water runoff from "gray fields" (shopping centers, office parks, apartment complexes, etc…) that will be redeveloped in the coming decades as our economy and demographics evolve. We must begin the process now of making this redevelopment as green as possible. Successful examples already abound.

#4 - Given the likelihood of future water shortages, it only makes sense to spur urban areas to capture and reuse more storm water for non-drinking water uses like irrigation. It also makes sense to require downstream water users (like Cary) to pay their fair share through slightly higher rates for the drinking water they consume.

Share on Facebook

Thanks for keeping this

on the front burner. It's muy importante, and I'm really worried the GA might try to slip some legislation through postponing the implementation of these rules.

I'm worried too.

They say a downturn is a terrible thing to waste. The anti-government crowd is definitely getting its money's worth. They're fighting anything that even smells like social responsibility by saying it adds to costs. It does. And it should.

Wait a few years to revisit and boom, too late. There'll be another round of mismanaged development grand-fathered in to the deal.

When in doubt, we should have public policy that protects water resources. It's simple risk management.

Triad governments

The principal threat to the political viability of the Jordan Lake rules as adopted by the EMC comes from active, organized opposition from Triad area local governments, especially those in the Haw and Deep river sub-basins. Those are the ones with no direct stake in the quality of Jordan water, but facing potentially significant stormwater management retrofit costs.

The ability of environmentally-friendly legislators from those counties (especially Guilford) to withstand the pressure to weaken the rules will be critical.

Dan Besse