Huh's prediction thread for the Senate primary
Submitted by Huh on Tue, 05/04/2010 - 5:31pm
I say that Lewis, Harris, Worthy and Williams can't get a combined 20%. If they can't then there is no runoff. Marshall 44%, Cunningham 38%
Anyone else care to venture a guess?







42 - 40
I think Elaine is going to squeak by, based on my one hour at a polling place where the average age made me look like a spring chicken ... and I'm really, really, old.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
squeak by
Marshall 41
Cunningham 37
Lewis 13
Williams 6
Worthy 2
Harris < 1
- - - - -
http://twitter.com/Jerimee
can I revise this?
With 5% of the vote in Harris has 7% of the total.
How did she get into the race? Who has backed her campaign?
http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/15705/23657/en/summary.html
- - - - -
http://twitter.com/Jerimee
Where's the turnout?
Any word on where it's especially low, vs. where it's not bad?
High Wake turnout is bad news for Cal.
Low Wake, high Triad is bad news for Elaine.
Ken's best shot is enormous turnout in Durham and Orange while everyone else forgot the election is today.
I was hearing "low, low" from Charlotte early, but don't know whether that changed in the afternoon.
In the absence of turnout data, your guess as posted is as good as mine.
Dan Besse
Early voting
WRAL in the Triangle says early voting was high in Wake, but the story overall is not very reassuring on the democracy front.
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7527861/
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
surprised to see that
yeah WRAL did act like turn-out was high in Wake... Wake poll volunteers certainly didn't feel that way, but looking at orangepolitics maybe it's a matter of degrees? seems the vote in orange was frightfully low
- - - - -
http://twitter.com/Jerimee
In Orange we did
manage to close one of our traditional early vote sites which made it harder for people to early vote, and of course we had a lot of the more interesting local elections (mayoral races, councilmen & aldermen races, city school board, & the like) in 2009.
Put me down for
Elaine at 43%, no runoff necessary.
Speaking of whatever
I found this fabulous paragraph at the end of a Daily Kos diary.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Can there be fundamentalism without religion?
Or should the question be the other way around?
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
The two go hand-in-hand, but I think sorts of fundamentalism
exist elsewhere...or have. Absolute rulers create a cult of followers who believe the great one's words are law and not subject to interpretation...for example. Perhaps, in context, bushido could be a "fundamentalist" sect.
Stan Bozarth
Anecdotal Meck data
Turnout looks to be pretty low today in Meck. The precinct I just left had 170 voters, less than 10%.
Looks like most of the state
Nice map here
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
I doubt
we'll be seeing much green on that map tonight...
Cal's ahead in New Hanover county
537 votes to Marshall's 497...with about 10% reporting. My precinct has only (at this time) 47 votes tallied. I'm guessing Republican turnout was far greater than Democratic. Sheesh!
Stan Bozarth
I'm really surprised that
I'm really surprised that Lewis and the others pulled in the numbers that they did. Is this a result of the low turnout? I'm guessing that higher turnout would have resulted in lower percentages for them. Hopefully when the runoff is over the party can smoothly come together in support of the winner and the DSCC will help Elaine just as enthusiastically as they will CC should she come out on top once again. Elaine can beat Burr if she gets the financial support it will take.
I'm a moderate Democrat.