Les Merritt's Excellent Voter Roll Auditing Adventure
Les Merritt and The DOJ's Zealous Attempt to Purge, Part II
Lots of hemming and hawing, but no finger poking and everyone left the meeting understanding the elections process alot better.
Merritt defends audit of N.C. voter rollsDAVID INGRAM
RALEIGH --State Auditor Les Merritt defended his review of North Carolina's voter rolls Tuesday, saying it is not motivated by partisan politics.
"I don't consider this to be a partisan issue, and I don't want it to be perceived that way," Merritt, a Republican, told a state Senate elections committee.
"Sometimes there can be explanations for things, or for everything. That's why we have the process," Merritt said.
...N.C. Democratic Party chair Jerry Meek pointed to reports of politicization of the GOP-led U.S. Justice Department, which has put an increased focus on reports of voter fraud.
"Either Les Merritt is incompetent, lacking even a basic understanding of election law, or he's using his position as State Auditor to pursue the partisan agenda of the national Republican Party," Meek said in a news release. "Either way, voters should be worried."
Merritt gave no timetable for when his office might release a final report.
---------------------------------------------------
Read tomorrow's Charlotte Observer for more details on this developing story.
Afternoon edit: another blogger pointed out that "Under the Dome" has more plus quotes by Senator Daniel Clodfelter.
A bill to allow voters to register three days before an election is back.
Last week, Senate leaders pulled the bill — for the third time — after state Auditor Les Merritt told them that a preliminary investigation showed problems with the state voter rolls.
...But Sen. Dan Clodfelter said that Merritt's report was incomplete and should not affect the bill. He also cautioned against interfering with the legislative process without good reason."If you're going to blow the whistle on something, you need to know whether there's a problem or not," he said.
BUT AGAIN, EXACTLY WHAT IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) UP TO? That remains to be answered.







wow
go Jerry
Draft Brad Miller-- NC Sen ActBlue
"Keep the Faith"
Excellent Quotes from Les Merritt today
- - - - -
Where Liddy At?
Where is Liddy?
Anyone seen Liddy?
- - - - -
http://twitter.com/Jerimee
If it is attention the man wants
it is attention the man will get.
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
update: Nagging Question - what is DOJ up to? That is Question
Last week, Senate leaders pulled the bill — for the third time — after state Auditor Les Merritt told them that a preliminary investigation showed problems with the state voter rolls.
...But Sen. Dan Clodfelter said that Merritt's report was incomplete and should not affect the bill. He also cautioned against interfering with the legislative process without good reason.
"If you're going to blow the whistle on something, you need to know whether there's a problem or not," he said.
BUT AGAIN, EXACTLY WHAT IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) UP TO? That remains to be answered.
Send this to your Congressman and ask them to add this to the inquiries in Washington about the politicization of our Department of Justice Voting Rights Division.
The DOJ mandate
in the area of voting rights has always been focused on ensuring that no individual or group of individuals is prevented from voting. The only reason they would/should get involved with purges is if the purging authority is too aggressive. From their website:
The Constitution and subsequent amendments that deal with voting issues are very specific, and all have one thing in common: the only goal of Federal involvement in the elections process is to guarantee voting rights are not abridged.
To vigorously pursue the removal of names from voting rolls is not only outside the DOJ's civil rights mandate, it is also veeery close to being outside of the U.S. Constitution.
News 14 article and video slants in favor of Merritt claims
News 14 slants their article as if Merrit's claims have merit.
But the NC State Board of Elections debunked Merritt's "preliminary research".
GO to the link and see the video anyway.
How large was their database?
How many voter reg records did they reference in order to arrive at the 25,000 number for incorrect DL#s?
Anybody know?
no one is sure
The Bartlett letter actually challenged the numbers they claimed to have looked at. Merritt said 50% and he said 4.5 million voters. Except we have 5.5 million total registered voters.
So no one has any idea what he is talking about.
Draft Brad Miller-- NC Sen ActBlue
"Keep the Faith"
Out of 4.5 million, then...
I'd have to say I'm surprised they were able to find only 25,000 bad DL#s.
I mean, I've worked more voter reg drives than I care to admit, and the amount of incorrect info people put down on those forms is just astounding. Factoring for sloppy handwriting alone would get you 25,000.
Seriously.
that is because
Gary Bartlett runs a tight ship with some amazing employees throughout the state.
Those people care and it shows.
Draft Brad Miller-- NC Sen ActBlue
"Keep the Faith"
I agree
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Absolutely.
Our County BOE is one of the best run agencies/offices in the county. Responsive, friendly, and they know their stuff.
about 98 percent of drivers license match, only 80% of ss#s matc
At issue is WHEN was the state required by law to check the Drivers license or the social security numbers against govt databases. That's where Merritt goes wrong, he is finding voters who have been in the system before NC was required to verify that info.
Now, what happens today when voters register to vote in North Carolina?
You can contact me for more information. NO, Same Day Registration does not correct this problem.
Thanks for the info
From the .pdf:
Matches can fail because of clerical errors, identical 4 digits of SS numbers between multiple people, applicants providing driver license numbers from a previous state because they don't yet have a new driver license, or an elections clerk may make an honest mistake in data entry for example. None of these mistakes mean that the applicant is ineligible to vote, but any of them may keep eligible citizens from the polls because of North Carolina’s practices. The registrant who does not provide a drivers license or social security number will not be subjected to the matching, but will be assigned a unique identifier and will be registered. This voter will be required to show some sort of identification the first time they vote. See the enclosed North Carolina Voter Registration Form.
I wasn't aware of this, so thank you for the education. Required reading for all future voter reg. drives.