The NC GOP, not-so-strict Constitutionalists
Another mask gets ripped off the face of Republicans:
Berger doesn’t want to present voters with a “California-style ballot” with “page after page” of amendments in 2012, because he thinks voters won’t give them due consideration.
But he said lawmakers could also consider brand-new amendments. “It’s my understanding under the rules, it would not have to already have been introduced – it’s something that could be introduced in the constitutional issues session, so there may be any number of others.”
Which can also be described as a "free-for-all". Or a clusterfuck. Whatever the case, it's about as far away from Conservatism as you can get.
BlueNC is dedicated to making North Carolina a more progressive and prosperous state. If your intention is to disrupt this effort, please find somewhere else to express your opinions.
Like?


Comments
Anyone supporting Voter ID does not respect the NC Constitution
The idea that Phil Berger would somehow care about the NC Constitution now after he and his colleagues ignored Article IX of the NC Constitution in its entirety -- the section titled "EDUCATION" -- and Sections 3 and 9 in particular, is just fantasy.
Phil Berger and his GOP colleagues ignore the NC Constitution daily. They can't begin to claim the mantle of strict constructionists at all.
Article I