North Carolina's Precious Wetlands At Risk

You may have already seen this piece over at The Dome regarding efforts by Camden and Currituck counties to block the Navy's construction of an Outlying Landing Field (OLF) on the basis of distressed and endangered species that inhabit the local wetlands. While I have my fingers crossed that this approach will work, I've seen much evidence that protecting our North Carolina wetlands and the myriad species that inhabit them is of little concern to those we have granted the authority to decide these things.

Before I begin my indignant finger-pointing, I want to talk a little bit about our wetlands. You should already know that they provide sanctuary and an ideal environment for all sorts of life to survive and procreate, but you may not be aware of just how unique North Carolina's coastal wetlands are in wider regional ecosystems.

While there are bird and fish species whose entire lifecycle takes place within our river basin and sounds, there are also many other species that have designated NC's coastal plain as their extreme Northern or Southern migratory boundary. To put it crude terms, they either have sex here or have their babies here. My point is, what happens in our wetlands has the potential of a much broader impact, affecting ecosystems a thousand miles away or more.

Another important function of wetlands deals with hydrological activity. We've talked about how important it is for rainfall to infiltrate the soil (as opposed to runoff). That slow migration of groundwater not only filters it extremely well, it serves to (once again) naturally sequester toxins we have released into the air via industrial emissions. Wetlands serve a similar function. Rivers and creeks flow into the basin and disperse, plant and animal life consume the nutrients and toxins, very often rendering them either inert or changing the chemical composition into something healthy and productive for the local ecosystem. As such, the waterways that feed into the Pamlico and Albemarle Sounds via our wetlands are much safer for fish, which is why so many of them choose these routes to spawn.

I think you're getting the picture. Our wetlands are more than just swampy stretches of underdeveloped land; they are dynamic and provide integral and irreplaceable benefits for us and our fellow creatures. Defending them should be at the top of everybody's list, not just conservationists and those opposed to jet aircraft landing fields.

Now to the finger-pointing. We've talked about the looming loss of 1,000 acres of wetlands thanks to the idiotic invitation of Titan Cement into an already distressed area, but I stumbled across something the other day that made me say some words I've been trying to stop saying.

While doing the eye-crossing reading for my Mercury piece the other day, I noticed a surprisingly large Mercury emitter in my "other" category (not a power plant). A Beaufort County company called PCS Phosphates emitted 260 pounds of Mercury from its stacks last year. That's right, over ten percent of the entire State's stack-air emissions of Mercury came from this single facility. This lovely plant also spewed tons of Ammonia and Methyl Isobutyl Ketones, with a dusting of Sulfuric Acid, Benzo Perylene, Lead and Manganese, just for flavor's sake. If our friends at the NC Conservation Network are still taking nominations for Pollution Superstars, jot down PCS Phosphates as my nomination, if'n you don't mind.

If you weren't already aware of this company's environmental impact, and you're wondering why you don't know, wonder no longer:

Made cash donations to local community organizations totaling $225,000 in 2008; main recipients were the United Way, Aurora Fossil Museum, East Carolina University, Capital Area YMCA and Public Radio East.

Made in-kind contributions totaling $95,611 to Bonner Boy Scout Camp, Pantego Volunteer Fire Department, Pamlico County, Belhaven Fire Department and City of Washington.

Held 65 meetings with state legislators, regulators or their aides in 2008, at which we discussed mine continuation, air quality permits and regulatory inspections.

The fertilizer business is extremely profitable, and PCS Phosphates and its parent company Potash wrote the book on how to lobby. Which *sigh* brings me back around to our precious wetlands. A battle has been going on for years between environmentalists and this polluter over plans to greatly expand their phosphate mining. From our friends at the Southern Environmental Law Center(SELC):

The Albemarle-Pamlico Sound is one of the most productive North American fisheries, generating thousands of jobs and over $1 billion annually. Unfortunately, this valuable ecosystem has been put at risk by a phosphate mining operation in Beaufort County that would result in the largest single destruction of wetlands in North Carolina’s history, causing irreversible impacts to the region’s tourism and fishing future.

PCS Phosphate is seeking to mine 11,000 acres, including 4,000 acres of wetlands and about five miles of tidal creeks and streams bordering the Pamlico River. The planned destruction is so massive that PCS has asked the state for permission to relieve it of the legal obligation to offset its impacts by restoring natural buffers, and instead be held to less effective means of mitigation.

The area the company seeks to mine will permanently damage primary fishing habitat where both economically important commercial and recreational fish species spend all or part of their life cycle. Destroying these important fisheries will impact this region long after PCS has left the area, and there are no mitigation measures that can reverse this damage. This is to say nothing of the impacts the destruction of wetlands and tidal creeks will have on the region’s tourism and other important parts of the region’s economy.

In spite of all of the reasons why our government should refuse to allow this to happen, the Army Corps of Engineers, the EPA and the NCDWQ have all taken positions that help to facilitate this travesty.

If anybody reading this has any power or influence that can be brought to bear on this issue, I'm asking you to use it now. If you've been saving it up for something special, this one's it.

Comments

Thank you, Steve

I'm not surprised by the Army Corps of Engineers. They are engineers in the narrowest and shortest-term sense of the word. But EPA and NCDWQ - especially the latter - that's just plain sick.

Here's hoping there are many lawsuits on the horizon.

The Corps of Engineers

has done both good stuff and bad stuff for the environment, which is why I raised doubts about the OLF thing. A lot seems to hang upon the Corps of Engineers' displeasure over the Navy's behavior, but that kind of thing can change with a few phone calls.

I wouldn't hang an expensive coat on that hanger.

If Navy doesn't take the wetlands, maybe 500 ft wind turbines?

If you want them on protected ridgelines, then why not in the wetlands, saharrison?

I'd put them

in the open waters of the sounds, but not in the wetland areas. Just like I would put them on some of the ridgetops, that meet all the various permitting requirements, but not all of them.

Does that answer your question?

So my backyard but not yours for wind turbines?

Places that are precious to me do not matter, but how dare we discuss places that are important to you?

The Wind Industry is a total scam. You go right ahead and waste your money and watch your electric bills go up and up and watch this country fall and fall.

It really isn't about views, mountains, wetlands, or any place in this state it is about:

Wind’s unpredictability means it truly has no generating capacity value, and its construction will not displace building any new coal or natural gas generating capacity. Grid reserve margins require wind-back up, and the inefficiency of quickly firing up a natural gas unit to meet erratic wind generation output means any emissions displacement is minimal. Wind is simply an additional capital cost which proves to be more than twice as expensive for the ratepayer.
—Tom Hewson, "Calculating Wind Power's Environmental Benefits", Power Engineering, July 2009

If there's sufficient wind in the wetlands, of course

wind generation should be considered there. Wind farms probably make sense in some areas of wetlands, but not all, just like they might make sense in some areas of the mountains but not all.

Your extremism on this issue undermines your credibility and the value of your sources. I can find someone on the internet to disagree or agree with almost any position anyone wants to take on anything. But your position doesn't pass the smell test. In Denmark, for example, wind accounts for roughly 13% of total energy needs. That sounds pretty smart to me.

Is it a cure-all? Of course not. But it should be part of the mix. And declaring broad areas of the country off limits because of aesthetics seems like bad public policy to me.

James how big is Denmark?

You use a country the size of Denmark? What?
Compare it to a STATE in this country please, so that all here will know how big this country is!

Please present more facts....I love them.

Maybe I am "extreme" regarding this topic, but the more research I do (and yes I do use PRO WIND figures at times in my writing/editorials/guest columns. I am passionate about this, even more so than when I first arrived.

This is not about aesthetics. Take the time to read, James!

Denmark is half the size of North Carolina

And wind power is perfectly scalable.

If North Carolina could get 13% of its energy from wind, even if that amount of energy was delivered with less than optimal predictability, this would be a very good thing.

By the way, it is very easy to find out how big a country is. The Google machine is your friend.

James, Offshore/Nearshore could look like this in NC. OUCH!

So you are OK with the coast looking like this as this is what it looks like in Denmark,
offshore wind that looks like this in Denmark

How do you insert a picture in to the body of your comment, James?

I do not feel commercial wind should be part of the mix. Small residential is OK, but not commercial.

I don't have a problem with that

although I don't think that would happen in NC.

Besides, there are huge sections of our state that already look like this:

Pictures James....would be appreciated

I was hoping to get information from you James on how to put a picture or video in a post, but I have heard nothing. You decide to put YOUR picture in your post. WHAT?

Commercial wind is just not there when you need it.
Yes, I do love this cartoon.

I would appreciate directions...or do I send them to the moderator or you before they can be placed in a post?

These are 125 feet tall

A comercial wind turbine is 400 to 500 feet tall. With the blade attached it is much like a 747 spinning at the top of the Washington Monument. The mountain counties, and the coastal counties do not have large clusters of transmission towers as you have pictured. These are very small compared to a 2 or 3MW wind turbine, and if you put 40 to 50 of these size turbines on a ridge, or just off the coast, it will not be pretty.

Denmark's new report on their wind energy is hot off the press, got my copy on Friday. It is a 39 page read, but it gives the most up to date information. It reinforces how wind energy does not work.

Demark Stats

James how big is Denmark?* Chaos

It's Really Really Big in Porn, Dope, Pot, Enhancing Sexual Marketing internet programs, Medical Transgender body changes Operations at discount prices, Massive Tourism from Secret Republicans who take vacations there to monitor the family life socialist style advances, And finally the location of the New World Order Supercomputer " 666" known as the "Beast" to Sara Palin Republican Religious worshipers...It was also the first Nation in history to surrended in record time to the Germans in WW2 and the last Nation in history to surrended back to the Allies after the Germans left in record time back to Belin in WW2. It also produce the biggest female Blond in the Acting Business " Briget Nelson" a 6 foot 6 inch Blond of the German Superace Warrior program. One other note, Demark is much, much bigger than North Carolina, it owns Greenland and governs 500 Polar Bears and 26 Eskimos of Viking Blood.

Gotta love ya, Mad Town

Love your humor, Mad Town. You're a hoot !!

Did you even read what I said?

If you had, you would have understood that I want turbines in some areas of the coast, and some areas of the mountains, areas which have the least impact on people and wildlife.

And as far as the guy you quote there, he makes his living advising industry and investors about the pricing of emissions allowances:

Since its creation in 1981, Mr. Hewson has been a principal at Energy Ventures Analysis where he directs the firm's environmental studies. He is the author of EVA's Clean Air studies and price forecasts on NOX and SO2 emission allowance trading markets. His work includes numerous analyses on emerging future environmental requirements, and their influence on electricity, coal and natural gas emission allowance values.

Of course he's against clean energy, because there aren't any emissions for him to analyze.

Put a spin on it harrison, as I am watching!

He is not against clean energy. WHAT A SPIN! You must have a huge investment in wind energy somewhere, as you sound just like them.

He is a scientist, and he is against WIND INDUSTRY. Get it straight.

This is an "Oh, My Goodness" moment !

Wind energy is in its infancy. It is contributing to lower use of other sources of energy that are created through the use of fuels that aren't environmentally friendly. The windmills in California, for example, are generating electricity that is then put back into the grid and sold as such reducing the need for electricity derived through other, less detrimental sources. Is it a "silver bullet"? No, of course not. We have to utilize all of our options if we are to become both energy-independant AND be better stewards of our planet at the same time. No "option" will be able to just suddenly replace the energy sources that pollute our world on its own. We must take the effort to continue to grow each option on its own and incrementally.

Anyone that has ever been to the hills of California knows that having 6,000 windmills strung along the "windline" there wouldn't have happened if it wasn't something that at least contributed to what I have spoken about above.

Burn Baby! Burn!

Anyone that has ever been to the hills of California knows that having 6,000 windmills strung along the "windline" there wouldn't have happened if it wasn't something that at least contributed to what I have spoken about above.* Foxtrot

That might explain why Califoria leads the world in Forest Fires with 6,000 Blast Furnances going at the same time.......Of course, look on the bright side, when California breaks off and slides into the Pacfic Ocean and becomes the nation " Pacfic" after a epic mega earthquake, it will be the first mobile nation with 6,000 outboard motors pushing it around Alaska and Japan as a Tour Nation....

HAHAHAHA...cute Mad Town

I can't tell you how many times I've heard that very same thing from just SO many people.

Absolutely NOTHING you said discounts what I have said and actually, has NOTHING to do with my post.

Cute, though. I will give you that. :)

Sarcasm?

"Of course, look on the bright side, when california breaks off and slides into the Pacific Ocean and becomes the nation 'Pacific' after a epic mega earthquake, it will be the first mobile nation with 6,000 outboard motors pushing it around Alaska and Japan as a Tour Nation..." Mad Town

As James said, a lot of this going around on BlueNC.

All is well

It's all good.

Things are slow, so we all end up talking about each other and silly stuff. Plus lots of people are just burned out on it all. I've been at this almost four years.

Don't get caught up in Mad Town. He's off the beaten path far enough to make following him a somewhat perilous journey. But being the tolerant, generous people that we are :) it seems to mostly work.

Mad Town, you know I love you, man.

Pretty good site

Here.

Nice little writeup on how things work.

-b

--

There cannot fail to be more kinds of things, as nature grows further disclosed. - Sir Francis Bacon

Chaos

Anyone can post pictures at anytime from anywhere. There's no need to go through a moderator. If you were so inclined, you could look on the Google and find a thousand sites that explain how to do it. Here's one that took me exactly three seconds to find.

I'm going to go into your post and edit it so the picture shows. You'll be able to go in after me and see the code. That should give you all the information you need to do it yourself in the future.

Also, please read this website about copyright. Images that aren't in the public domain can't be used without permission and without providing credit and links to the source - and many can't be used even then.

Finally, if you're going to get into the business of posting images regularly, you should learn to use a service (free) like Photobucket.

Vacation time James? Recommended!

James I did try several ways to get a picture in to the comment section.

. If you were so inclined, you could look on the Google and find a thousand sites that explain how to do it. Here's one that took me exactly three seconds to find.

I heard you talking about this web site in the past on a radio station. IMO, you have lost something a long the way...perhaps enthusiasm? Passion?

Finally, if you're going to get into the business of posting images regularly, you should learn to use a service (free) like Photobucket.

Talking down to people are we?

Thanks for the talking down, but no thanks.

What I've lost is my tolerance for people with bad manners.

n/t