On Larry Craig, And Filibusters, Or, Wanna Make A Trade?

“When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro”
--Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

There are times when only the most evil of thinkers are able to grasp an excellent opportunity to do good in a most unlikely place.

As one of the most evil thinkers I know, I stand here today to tell you that we have an opportunity to turn this Larry Craig situation into a chance to stand Mr. Bush’s war plans on their head-if we are willing to play the extremely brutal political game required.

Wanna hear more?
Read on...

Before we proceed further, I offer two stipulations:

--I acknowledge up front that this is entirely inappropriate behavior for a civil person to propose.

--I further admit that this is no way to treat a man (Senator Craig) who is, in his heart, a troubled person in a most difficult situation.

That said, let’s set the stage:

We cannot advance the choices we want in regard to the war because our Republican friends in the Senate threaten to block any action with a filibuster; and further threaten to “hold the cards” that prevent the override of that veto.

There is enormous fear in the Republican community because of the “moral threat” posed by Craig’s decision not to leave the Senate, and the fact that that image of Craig’s “wide stance” will persist all the way to Election Day, dragging the Rs deeper into the muck the closer the vote gets.

At the moment, the Rs cannot remove Craig, which they would dearly love to do, because there is no way to obtain a majority on the Ethics Committee unless Democrats agree to join the R members of that committee in a vote.

Beyond that, there is no way the Rs can obtain the votes on the Senate floor to remove Craig unless Ds decide to throw the Rs a life preserver.

So what I’m advising is:

Let’s throw them that life preserver...for a price.

Harry Reid should approach Mc Connell and say something more or less like this: “You give me the votes I need to pass a Defense Department budget with a timeline attached, and you deliver the votes for the override...and the next day we’ll give you the votes to remove Craig.”

I know how inherently bad this is on a moral level, but you know what?

I’m sick of the idea that nothing will change in this war for 18 months, at least-and I’m ready to take any action that will stop Mr. Bush from creating the momentum he wants to carry this war into the next Administration.

I will happily trade Craig’s political life for the very real lives of the 1000 or so troops that will die before January 2009.

If all that wasn’t enough, it will teach the Rs some very real lessons about what you sow when you treat politics as a Rovian exercise.

So that’s my idea for today.

I admit it is the wrong way to practice politics, but that said I feel the savings of 1000 American lives is well worth the sacrifice of Craig...and I suspect any Republican who is a fan of Jack Bauer will have a tough time disagreeing.

Share on Facebook

Great idea for today.

Maybe they'll throw in impeachment with Craig's lyin' ass.

if we are patient...

...we'll get that chance too.

scandals abound these days.

"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965

That's a great idea but you're assuming people on the hill

actually think strategically and have goals resembling those of the American people. I see no evidence that either is true.
 
News of the 10th district: See Pat Go Bye Bye,

but their goals and ours align...

...getting the troops more rationally situated equals higher approval ratings for congressional ds...which means the presidential candidates might not do all the fundraising, and d congressional candidates won't have to spend as much to win the elections in which they compete.

on the other side of the aisle, the r congressional candidates are already trying to distance themselves from the r presidential candidates-and they need to raise their approval ratings even more than the ds...and their fundraising prospects are currently the most bleak of all the folks in this cycle.

r incumbents would hate and love this deal...which is a beautiful thing to me.

"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965

I'm not saying it isn't an excellent idea

I just don't think rs and ds are strategically smart enough to understand it. They have to be told what to do by their pollsters, who also aren't too smart.

That's how I see it. Maybe they'll surprise me.
 
News of the 10th district: See Pat Go Bye Bye,

sometimes it seems...

...tunnel vision catches up to the campaign strategists, and the beauty of the "open-source" political model is the potential for this sort of bizarre thinking.

but as you say, it still requires the ds to actually grab the idea and accept it.

"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965

So

How come we're not running things? *I* can figure this shit out.

I just don't think rs and ds are strategically smart enough to understand it. They have to be told what to do by their pollsters, who also aren't too smart.


Be the change you wish to see in the world. --Gandhi

i would settle for...

...simply having a few useful ideas stolen and then adopted.

"...i feel that if a person can't communicate, the very least he can do is to shut up." --tom lehrer, january 1965