Republicans still don't get it

Among my least favorite things in the world are troop-lovin' Republican hypocrites, and god knows we have more than a few of them representing North Carolina in Congress. But even I was surprised at their recent spate of mindless mumblings, as reported in today's Charlotte Observer.
While support for the war among Carolinas Republicans remains high, Myrick and two other lawmakers from the area voiced critical comments about Bush's ability to convey his message effectively. Though their criticism is mild, it echoes concerns among Republicans across the country about Bush.
U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick said Bush hasn't been able to effectively portray the enemy to the American people. "Iraq became the centerpiece," the Charlotte Republican said. "He has not, in my opinion, done a good job of talking about the big picture, the worldwide problem of the radicalization of the jihadists and what they intend to do."
Rep. Patrick McHenry, a Cherryville Republican, said the president should have characterized the challenge as a "war against Islamic extremists" instead of a war on terrorism. "Terrorism is merely a tactic. Islamic extremists are the ones actively targeting Americans because they loathe our culture, laws and freedoms," McHenry said.
Rep. Robin Hayes, R-Concord, said, "The administration's effort in communicating with the American people has not been very good."
How more out of touch with reality could these people possibly be? They think the problem with Bush's War is a communications failure instead of a strategic, tactical, ethical, moral and competence failure. But it gets even worse, as expected, from Delusional Hayes:
"I think the president has fundamentally allowed our military leaders to make and execute military strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is the correct thing to do," Hayes said.
Is Hayes truly that insane? I guess that's what happens when you have chickensh*t frat boys playing Army with real lives and real bullets. And just to be clear, if the military leaders were making strategy in Iraq, we wouldn't be there. Period.
Not to be outdone, Howie jumps into the act with a breathtaking new awareness of the obvious:
Rep. Howard Coble, R-Greensboro, agrees that the military ought to be calling the shots on the war, but said he has reached a bit of a turning point. "I'm at a point where I think this is going to have to be done diplomatically and politically, rather than militarily," he said.
Duh.
And finally, we have pearls of wisdom from Dumber and Dumberer.
"I don't believe in arbitrary timelines that essentially announce our strategy to our enemies," said Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C. "I'm monitoring the troop surge very closely because I don't support an indefinite commitment. It's time for the Iraqis to truly commit to stabilizing their country."
Is Dole breaking ranks with Bush's new "Iraq = Korea" doctrine? Or does 50 to 100 years not qualify as "indefinite" in her book? If the woman ever says one thing that's not entirely ridiculous, I'm sure I'll keel over dead.
"As Baghdad becomes more secure, it will allow Iraqis to take over more of their own security, which will allow U.S. forces to scale down their presence in Iraq," he said.
Blah, blah, support troops, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, bullsh*t. "As Baghdad becomes more secure?" What world is Burr living in? Doesn't he understand that there's a whole dang country, not just a city, and as soon as one area gets the illusion of "more secure," all hell breaks loose in another area?
I don't know about you, but whatever little respect I had for our Bushbots in Congress has plummeted off the cliff into never-land. And just so you know it actually IS possible for a Congress-critter to be intelligent and informed about reality, consider this quote from the sole Democrat the Charlotte Observer interviewed:
"I'm unapologetically saying now we've got to get out of there," the Charlotte Democrat said. "We've got to tell them what our timetable is. The (Iraqi) government will either pick up the responsibility or they won't be able to pick it up. That's all we can do at this point.
"When I voted against the war, I didn't struggle with that. It was plain as day that a bunch of us were running around making a political judgment about something that didn't make any sense."
Kudos to the Charlotte Observer for an excellent round-up story.







The couch is over here! That will be a nickel a minute!
Kudos to the Charlotte Observer for an excellent round-up story.* A
Meanwhile today, 14 Americans were killed today in a peaceful surge by the Republican leadership in Iraq.
On the American front, 70 % of the American people want the War ended now.
The entire Republican Congressional leadership in North Carolina has made a earth shaking decison and agree to enter political therapy for denial issues.
A group of American Patriots called the Blackwater Group issue a media release today, saying they would take measures and secure the release of the Congressional leadership should they enter therapy under communists in Chapel Hill.
Nope. They still don't "get" Viet Nam either
and that is with the benefit of 30 years of hindsight.
How do you expect them to get current events?
Dear Patty,
These freedoms they hate us for, are they the same ones you and your party along with this administration are asking me to give up in order to win the war? Is Habeus Corpus one of these freedoms, is the right to privacy one of these freedoms? Is the freedom of and from religion one of these rights they hate us for?
If so, you would think they'd stop hating us after you along with those complicit in deteriorating the United States Constitution have effectively eroded these freedoms, they would stop hating us.
Why then, are they still declaring jihad against America? Could it be your simple-minded cliche truthiness statement is nothing more than war mongering propaganda? The same type of propaganda these extremists use to recruit militants against us, is the rhetoric you employ while trumpeting up this malformed idea for a war.
Sincerely,
A concerned American.
D'Souza
An interesting split, possibly.
Dinesh D'Souza, longtime dependable attack pundit, has a new (well, not so new) book.
And he comes close to blaming 9/11 and the Islamist jihad on....us. He blames us.
Or modernity, or freedom, or something like that. Actually, now that I think of it, he blames Anglico. Personally.
So, there it is: Anglico hates America. It always comes down to that. And the permissive left caused 9/11, because the righteous anger of Islam had to react against permissive American culture.
This book by D'Souza is one of the most interesting things I have seen in a long time, I have to admit. Many on the right decried it, but not everyone. If there is to be a worldwide fundamentalist revival, then we have met the jihad, and it is us.
What made me think of this is jjsmith's bit above: It is actually TRUE that "They hate our freedoms, so let's get rid of them, and make women wear burkhas" is consistent with the D'Souza position. jjsmith speaks as a reductio ad absurdum, but....I'm not so sure. Yikes.
"It is to secure our rights that we resort to government at all." --Thomas Jefferson to Francois D'Ivernois, 1795.
Michael C. Munger
Yep.
It's all my fault. I take full responsibility.
Somebody has to.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Well then, sir
I suggest you get over here and clean up this mess right now!
LCloud looks pointedly at the mound of paper that supposedly contains a desk.
Easy.
Slide the whole pile into a big black plastic bag and drive straight to the paper recycling center. Dump without looking at any of it.
If you get rid of anything important, someone else has it and will give it to you if you ask sweet.
Number 1 rule: Never touch a piece of paper twice.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Oddly enough,
I've been doing just that.
Stopping only to check in here, when my back gets tired.
I never touch a piece of paper twice
usually five or six times is my minimum. :)
Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Paper? you guys use paper?
where do you find it?
In a museum?
I got some...
in my bathroom.
Left on 49
Cabarrus Democrats
Dinesh D'Souza, longtime neo-con fool?
Dinesh D'Souza, longtime dependable attack pundit, has a new (well, not so new) book.* Liberty Mike
When will he find a real job and stop sucking on the tit of neo-con welfare?
And he comes close to blaming 9/11 and the Islamist jihad on....us. He blames us*.Liberty Mike
More BS from D'Souza! He needs to push that neo-con conspiracy theory in front of a 9/11 Truth conference and find out that his own Spooks did him in and most likely be the first speaker in America history hung on the spot by millions of Truth believers.
Or modernity, or freedom, or something like that. Actually, now that I think of it, he blames Anglico. Personally.*.Liberty Mike
Of course it was A fault, He is yet to give his whereabouts on 9/11under oath and when can we expect you to start kicking Art Pope puppy Sponge Bob? Get mean and aggessive man! Or you will be teaching Nifong 101at USC school of law.
Blue South
Check your email
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
These people just talk. . .
In concentric circles, depending on how deep into the issue you are.
Basically, they've all got a ton of blood on their hands, and it doesn't feel as good as it did when they were playing with their army men in the sandbox. I think they just don't want to take responsibility for their actions and make this right, because they just want to preserve their electoral status. And that is just as disgusting as what they've done, that they still have the coverup motives that they do.
War is over if you want it.
War is over if you want it.
im a waiting
Draft Brad Miller-- NC Sen ActBlue
"Keep the Faith"