Sen. Lindsey Graham & D.C. Republicans Obstruct Stimulus & Whine About Loss of Power
Last week, South Carolina Republican Senator, Lindsey Graham, created a stir and made the media rounds after throwing a tantrum on the Senate floor. I watched the entire tantrum live on C-Span and dissected it to see if it contained anything of value. I am looking for anything new the Republicans might offer that isn't the revenue reduction scheme they typically pander. I can honestly report that I found nothing. The Republicans in Washington don't like being out of power and they don't like Nancy Pelosi. They don't like Pelosi so much they are willing to throw the entire nation under the bus while they pout and lick their wounds.
As proof, I am posting Graham's entire tantrum with my commentary. You will find it at the end of this post. It's quite long, so I will break it down with some smaller portions just in case you don't have time to watch the entire thing. I tried to cut it down, but I didn't want anyone accusing me of taking the Senator's remarks out of context, so please bear with me. Whether this interests you or not, his delivery - what he said and how he acted - is representative of the rest of the D.C. Republicans.
Graham starts his tantrum giving Democrats permission to point fingers at George Bush and then proceeds to point his finger at the Democrats.
Admittedly, many Democrats have taken every opportunity to make sure the public knows this isn't their mess. The economy didn't get this way overnight. It was six years of total Republican control and two years of Republican obstruction and vetoes that sent our economy spiraling into free fall. The de facto leader of the Republican party, Rush Limbaugh, started calling the country's economic woes the "Obama Recession" not long after election day. You can't blame Democrats for wanting to set the story straight.
....And there you have it. It's the process. Senator Lindsey Graham has just exposed so many of those Republicans who claim philosophical differences as hypocrites. Listen to the press releases and the speeches on the House and Senate floor and the members chant this line like a mantra. Over and over and over again you hear complaints about "the process."
These Republicans don't seem to care about solving our economic problems. They are too busy whining about being in the minority. We've had eight years of Bush tax cuts and it didn't keep us from getting into this mess and Republicans think more tax cuts will get us out of this mess? The little bit we might get each month in tax savings isn't going to be enough to make a difference to the person who is having to choose between buying prescription drugs and putting food on the table. It won't mean long-term housing stability for many who are behind on mortgages or who have homes that have been devalued. When the banker calls their mortgage, that $400 tax rebate isn't going to be enough.
It is amazing how out of touch with reality and his own party Sen. Lindsey Graham is. He claims that Republicans don't believe this mess they created can all be fixed with tax cuts and yet the alternate bill submitted by House Republicans was a Tax Relief bill.
When House and Senate Republicans weren't whining about the process, they were complaining that the stimulus package didn't offer enough in tax breaks. I'm not sure who Lindsey Graham is fooling with this claim, but certainly anyone paying attention while the bill was making its way through the house knows he doesn't have a firm grasp on the reality of what his own party is saying or doing in this regard.
Then, Lindsey Graham gets to the crux of the matter.
Big, bad, mean Nancy Pelosi has hurt their feelings once again. What could Nancy Pelosi possibly have said or done to make hundreds of House and Senate Republicans pull together to block a bill that will create jobs and jump start our economy?
She reminded Republicans that Democrats won in November and that they are now in charge. Ooooooh. Poor little pissy Republicans. Big, bad, mean old Nancy Pelosi reminds Republicans they lost in November and they decide to throw the American people under the bus.
Graham continued complaining about the process throughout his speech. He mentioned a bipartisan group of 16 senators who were working in a room somewhere trying to come up with a solution and then later claims that there is no negotiating going on.
He claims that discussions in committee only lasted an hour and a half and later was corrected with the correct figure - 11.5 hours.
He repeatedly tossed red meat to his party by mentioning Ronal Reagan and Nancy Pelosi....but never in the same breath.
Graham's most egregious claim came when he accused President Barack Obama of not participating in this process. Obama has met with House and Senate Republican leadership, House and Senate rank and file members and he's entertained many at the White House. He has reached out to Republicans more in the last two weeks than George Bush did in any given year - especially the rank and file GOP members. Graham's not being disingenuous. Lindsey Graham is flat out lying.
In one tantrum of a speech Graham whined, lied and made a fool out of himself. You would think that delivering a speech on the floor of the United States Senate in a manner that reminds people of a three year old refusing to eat his peas would be embarrassing enough, but Graham took it a step further.
He accused Obama & the Democrats of doing too many news shows and having too many press conferences.
Soon after leaving the Senate floor, guess where he headed?
Hardball and Fox News. No lie. After accusing Democrats of doing too many news shows, Lindsey Graham headed for the closest camera he could find.
Lindsey Graham on Fox News
Lindsey Graham on Hardball
"Change You Can Believe In" does not mean giving Republicans another shot at ruining our economy. They've done enough damage for one century.







Full video will be up tomorrow
I'm loading in HD and it takes forever. Video looks better, but not sure the enhanced quality is worth the time it takes to load.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Here is part one
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Wow!
Worthy of McHenry!
I know he isn't an NC Senator
but what Graham said has been echoed by so many Republicans I'm sure I'll catch Burr saying some of these same things. Not sure I'll catch him throwing a tantrum.
***************************
Vote Democratic, the ass you save may be your own.
Great stuff, Betsy
Burr is different,as you say, only in the tantrum throwing department. He's a partisan lemming, though, focused only on what's good for Dick Burr and the GOP. I'm tracking him daily and I've yet to find ONE thing he's offered that's constructive about anything. His whole "fact finding" mission to Gitmo was nothing but a spotlight grab. Which to him is nothing more than "in keeping with America's highest ideals."
Political posturing and obstructionism: The American Way!
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Burr is more dangerous than Graham.
I met him in his office a few years ago. I was there with other members of NC-AEYC to talk about Early Childhood issues (Head Start, etc.). He didn't want to talk about ECE, he wanted to talk about his new "drop-out prevention" bill. No matter how many times members of my group tried to turn the conversation to our issues, he resolutely turned it back to his. He did it politely, and actually sounded like he knew what he was talking about. If we hadn't all been educators who knew he was blowing smoke, we might have believed him.
That's why he's dangerous: he doesn't rant, he doesn't throw tantrums, he sounds reasonable, even when he has no idea what he's talking about.
Meteor Blades calls it correctly
they are the Gee Oh Pee!
I too watched L. Graham and thought it was nothing more than a
childish tantrum. That's all we can expect, I fear, from the Republicans. They are dead set on seeing Obama and his plans and policies fail so they can point the fickle finger at him and Dems in 2010 and say their/our "socialist" policies failed and "i told you so."
I've written several scathing letters to Burr and called his office numerous times. He isn't listening. His line was busy...busy, and I'm guessing it wasn't the Republicans calling to support his obstructionism.
Who knows.
I'll say this...most of the Republicans I know aren't filthy rich and most of them need their jobs like the rest of America. This will finally hit home with them when THEY get the pink slip and start worrying about how to pay their bills and not become homeless.
A tax break won't look so good when they have no income against which to apply the GOP solution. Actually, I think the GOP has already gutted the most important parts of the package...support to states and medical care to unemployed and so on. Obama has got to fight them tooth and nail on this. Screw bi-partisanship. Anyway, what's bi-partisan about only 3 senators and NO republican house votes for the stimulus?
Stan Bozarth
Two-point plan
1) Grandstand for the base.
2) Pray Obama fails.
That's it. That's the GOP Congressional plan. That's what we're going to hear for the next year, possibly two.
The vast majority of them have little to no reason to seek compromise because they do not see themselves as representing constituencies with a significant interest in the success of domestic governmental programs. They are the D-Team from a wing of their party which believes in government failure as a point of principle.
In economic reality, most of these clowns do in fact represent constituencies with a stake in programmatic success. (Even if they're only banking, oil, utilities, etc. constituencies.) Many of them, however, seem genuinely too dense to recognize that and depart from their ideological talking points.
One of the more interesting questions for the next political cycle, especially if Obama and the Congressional Democrats succeed in reversing the economic decline and making a start on some other priorities, is whether the Business Republicans will manage to throw some of these simpletons now "representing" them under the bus in primary challenges.
Dan Besse
Hadn't noticed your new signature line
Very nice.
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
Lawyers, litigation, limitless?
As a lawyer myself, I still get annoyed over our society's litigiousness.
Can't resist the urge to poke fun from time to time.
Dan Besse
I updated my sig line about five minutes ago.
It's the review I promised, twitter sized.
Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.
-me
I'm so glad you loved it
and yep, it swept by too quickly for sure. Thanks for the Twitter sized review! WOOT!
Do good. Be nice. Have fun.
You left out the part about cutting taxes...
(although that may be included in #1 grandstand for your base).
That being said, I'm much more interested in your comment about the next political cycle and the Business Republicans. At some point, I hope and pray, it becomes evident that the mindless ideological talking points and the make-believe economics may make the politics more exciting, but do very little to make the government run any better or more effectively.
Good point
and yes, I do consider the absolute reliance on tax cuts as the one and only prescription for every economic ill to be a part of pandering to their base.
I certainly hope that there is a resurgence of economic realism within the Republican party. If not, I can see nothing but escalation of partisan divisiveness and a very tough time for our nation over the coming generation. The problems in passing a coherent stimulus bill help show how tough it is to do anything big at the national level in the face of total intransigence from one of the two major parties.
Next up: health care; and energy/climate policy. Won't those be fun with the three remaining GOP "moderate" Senators setting the limits?
Dan Besse
Time to go back to the real stand-on-your-feet filibuster
Won't that be fun to watch on C-Span? Lindsey Graham can have a 24 hour a day tantrum then.
from wikipedia:
Progressives are the true conservatives.