Senate Poised to Send Anglico to Jail

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


CHAPEL HILL - In a move that can only be described as pandering to American pseudo-patriots, the US Senate, led by Chickenhawk Richard Burr, is once again taking up a bill that will make desecration of the American flag unconsitutional. The story in USA Today, reports the sorry turn of events.

"It's scary close," said Terri Schroeder of the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the amendment. "People think it's something that's never going to happen. ... The reality is we're very close to losing this battle."

Congress regularly has debated the issue since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a Texas flag desecration law in 1989 and its own Flag Protection Act the next year. But until now, it has failed to muster the two-thirds vote needed in both the House of Representatives and the Senate before states try to ratify the measure.

Next week, the House will vote on the amendment for a seventh time. If history is a guide, it will pass for a seventh time. That's when the spotlight switches to the Senate, where the amendment has always died.

But this time may be different. Amendment supporters say last year's election expanding the Senate Republican majority to 55 has buoyed their hopes for passage. Five freshmen senators — Richard Burr of North Carolina, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, John Thune of South Dakota and David Vitter of Louisiana — voted for the amendment as House members and plan to do so again.

I predict such an amendment will spawn a frenzy of flag-burning unlike anything ever seen in the history of our republic. That dark day will indeed become National Flag Burning Day in America.

Please contact Richard Burr and thank him for spawning the destruction of more American flags than he can count.

Share on Facebook

John Hood?

Wouldn't you think the JFL libertarians would be up in arms about this assault on personal liberty? Fat chance.

Locke on flag burning

You have the right to burn your personal property but you may not be at liberty to do so.

Can I get some recommends?

at Daily Kos. Thanks.

Done.

Recommended at dKOS. Good string of comments. :)

good heads up.

Kudos on DK too. Seriously, when will this die?

Be just, and fear not.

Our children need to know that some people fought back, when others collaborated.

A Meeting of the Minds: Anglico and the Locker Room?

It looks like at least one of the Locker Roomers agrees that the amendment is a bad idea, though not for the same reasons.

This amendment is about property rights. It is about whether or not a person has a right to burn a flag that they purchased with their own money or possibly even stitched together with their own hands. In other words, do people have the right to dispose of their own property as they see fit? For this reason, no self-respecting conservative should have any problem voting against this amendment--unless, of course they are suggesting that the government not allow private ownership of flags.

Link. This also seems like a good reason to oppose the amendment, even if it isn't the only good reason (as the author seems to think).

Flag desecration amendment fails

The Senate just failed (34-66) to pass an amendment to the Constitution that would prohibit flag desecration.

Not on Senator said anything whatsoever about property rights, though I'm happy to have yet the Puppets weigh in with another good reason to oppose this violation of personal liberty.

The Locker Room poster argues this isn't about free expression . . . saying it's only about property rights. What a shame that people who fancy themselves libertarians can't get as interested in free speech as they can in private property.

Some brains only see in black and white

It's a congenital defect.

Jeez. One vote. It's madness.