military

Drug use, particularly the illicit use of prescription drugs, is on the rise all over the country – the U.S. military notwithstanding. A 2008 Department of Defense Health Behavior Survey revealed that prescription drug abuse doubled among U.S. military personnel from 2002 to 2005 and almost tripled between 2005 and 2008 .

Chris, a former injection drug user and a member of the military based out of Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, NC from 2005-2010, both witnessed and participated in drug use, including heroin and cocaine, prescription pills and alcohol. He started using in 2008, due in part to the stressful, rigid military lifestyle.

Jeff Riorden has enjoyed quite a few interesting career paths, including police officer, paramedic, and a health practitioner in the U.S. Navy before deciding to study at the Duke School of Nursing in Durham, North Carolina. All these careers have one thing in common – concern for public health and safety – which is why Jeff is also a supporter of harm reduction programs that reduce the spread of disease in our communities.

Along with many of his fellow nursing students, Jeff has come out to volunteer with the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition on our outreach trips through drug user and sex worker neighborhoods in Durham where we provide education and testing for HIV and hepatitis C. On these trips, he’s spoken about his experience as a former police officer and how law enforcement could benefit from a better understanding of harm reduction programs. Programs such as syringe exchange are shown to reduce the incidence of needle-sticks to officers by 66%.

There’s been a great deal of concern around here about the effort to prepare the US military for the full repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT), and I’ve had a few words of my own regarding how long the process might take.

There was a hearing before the House Armed Services Committee last Thursday that had all four Services represented; with one exception these were the same Service Chiefs that were testifying last December when the bill to set the repeal process in motion was still a piece of prospective legislation.

At that time there was concern that the “combat arms” of the Marines and the Army were going to be impacted in a negative way by the transition to “open service”; the Commandant of the Marine Corps and the Army’s Chief of Staff were the most outspoken in confirming that such concerns exist within the Pentagon as well.

We now have more information to report—including the increasing desperation of some of our Republican friends—and if you ask me, I think things might be better than we thought.

So we got the good news that legislative repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy that kept LBGT folks from openly serving in the military has occurred, as the Senate voted Saturday to first cut off debate on the question (that’s the vote that required 60 Senators to pass) and then to pass the actual repeal legislation (which also garnered more than 60 Senate votes, even though it only needed 51).

Most people would assume that once Bill (remember Bill, from Schoolhouse Rock?) made it out of Congress and over to the President to for a signature that the process of repeal will be ended—but in fact, there’s quite a bit more yet to do, and it’s entirely possible that a year or more could go by before the entire process is complete.

Today we’ll discuss our way through why it’s going to take so long; to illustrate the point we’ll consider an actual military order that is quite similar to the sort of work that will be required from the Department of Defense (DOD) before the entire “DADT to open service” transition is complete.

I have a ton of things on the desk at the moment, and I don’t have the time to really run out this story before Election Day, but I want to bring to your attention something very strange that I found on the 2008 “Christine O’Donnell for Senate” MySpace page.

What it basically comes down to is that the United States Marine Corps and the United States Army are “Christine O’Donnell for Senate” MySpace friends, or that there are persons who have created United States Army and USMC MySpace pages that purport to be official that have “befriended” her candidacy. There’s also a Navy page that appears to emanate from a US Navy recruiting office in California on her ’08 campaign’s “friends” list.

At a minimum, all of this would seem to be a combination of inappropriate behavior and poor management of social media; at worst, you have activity that is “some kind of unlawful”, either on an administrative or civil level.

I’ll make this fast...but I’ll also make it interesting.
Follow along, and you’ll see what I mean.

What do the experienced military folks on here think about this article?

The author (months ago) asserts that aircraft carriers have never really had any defenses against ballistic missles anyway, so all this talk about Chinese missiles we're seeing in the MSM is muchado about nothing.

Here’s the sentence: “Ships currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack.”

General Stanley McChrystal pulled off another successful special operation with his resignation from the fools errand commonly referred to as Afghanistan. The facts are McChrystal couldn't quit, but desperately needed a way out. He knows, just as Petraeus does, that this administration can't even spell 'military' much less know how to utilize them, and therefore Afghanistan is a complete waste of blood and treasure. Even worse now than under Bush.

First, invite the Rolling Stone into your inner circle knowing that the article will force the hand of the president.
Second, do so in time to take the family on a much deserved summer vacation.
Third, and most importantly, resign and retire with full benefits.
Fourth, make money on a tell-all book and speaking tour as one becomes the 21st century equivalent of MacArthur.

X-Posted from CitizenWill.org

I generally don't say much on CitizenWill about Federal officeholders but since there's been a lot of blather about Elaine Marshall's chances of overcoming Richard Burr I thought I would submit one way she can challenge Burr's reputation of supporting our troops.

Elaine, as part of her Senate campaign, started a petition calling on Burr to support a Consumer Finance Protection Agency.

Burr, so far, and his Republican colleagues have been less than supportive (to put it mildly) of the initiative.

Three North Carolina Libertarians candidates for Congress endorse repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” and view it as a civil rights issue that should be handled by Congress and the Department of Defense.

Current status of the Stop Outsourcing Security Act (H.R. 4650). If your representative is not on this list please contact them and urge co-sponsorship. There is a comparable bill in the Senate which has yet to be given a bill number (view it at http://sanders.senate.gov/files/SOS%20Text.pdf). Thank you.

Rep Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI-2] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-14] - 2/25/2010

Rep Ellison, Keith [D-MN-5] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Filner, Bob [D-CA-51] - 2/23/2010 *

Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. [D-TX-20] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-7] - 2/23/2010 *

Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. [D-IL-4] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Hall, John J. [D-NY-19] - 2/23/2010 *

Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [D-NY-22] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Holt, Rush D. [D-NJ-12] - 2/23/2010 *

Rep Lee, Barbara [D-CA-9] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-14] - 2/23/2010 *

Rep McGovern, James P. [D-MA-3] - 2/23/2010 *
Rep Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] - 2/23/2010 *