Thomasville City Council approves anti-gay marriage resolution 5-1
Cross-post from Matt's personal blog, MattHillNC.com |The Q-triad Blog
Tonight, the Thomasville City Council approved, five to one, a resolution urging the North Carolina General Assembly to send an anti-gay marriage amendment to the voters. The Council will send their resolution to Thomasville's representatives in the General Assembly, where it should be circulated to the other members and promptly ignored by our Democrat-controlled Senate and House (as the amendment has been ignored for the past three years in a row). The meeting, however, didn't come without a fight from those supportive of equality and those who simply want government out of the business of marriage. There were plenty of positive things too, including some great statements against the resolution from a Thomasville citizen who also noted the great statements from one of Thomasville's City Councilmembers.
The resolution was presented last week by Council members Dwight Cornelison and Raleigh York, Jr. The resolution states, in part: "the undersigned members of the Thomasville City Council ask the North Carolina General Assembly to allow the citizens of our state… the opportunity to amend our State Constitution to protect the institution of marriage in the state of North Carolina and define the type of marriage to be recognized as valid in our state.” (full text at later in the post)
Before the City Council (pictured right) voted on the resolution numerous members of the public spoke to the Council. Five individuals, including me, spoke against the resolution. Two of the five, Cris Elkins and Samuel Johnson, came to speak after receiving one of the email updates from NC Advocacy. Robbi Cohn, an EqualityNC supporter, found out about the resolution because she lives in Thomasville. The other speaker, Barney Hill, a self-described "heterosexual Baptist," is also a Thomasville citizen, one who evidentally watches the actions of his government very closely and one who regularly attends government meetings. Only one person, the Reverend Ron Baity of Berean Baptist Church in Winston-Salem, NC, spoke in favor of the resolution. Two girls, about my age, came to speak also, but came just a tad too late to sign up for the Public Forum. Members of the media were also present, including The Winston-Salem Journal (story should be printed in the Tuesday, October 17th issue) and WFMY News 2 (which did a great story at the 11pm news broadcast).
Click here to hear a recording of the meeting (edited down to just the Public Forum section and vote on the resolution).
Barney Hill (like I said, a self-described "heterosexual Baptist" Thomasville citizen) was, perhaps, the strongest speaker on the issue. It was surprising to see a member of the general audience stand up and speak against the resolution. Here's what Barney had to say:
I hope it’s legal for a heterosexual Baptist to be against this because I am… I speak in opposition of [the resolution]… Miss [Marie] Culbreth [City Council, Ward 2] had this one nailed: It is nothing more than a scheme to hijack the North Carolina Constitution to make a political statement about sexual preferences. I already sat through this movie one time. The resolution in front of you tonight differs in two ways from the one the County Commissioners rejected: number one, it’s more long winded and number two, it doesn’t say what it really means. I can excuse verbosity, but not dishonesty. I’m 56 years old and single for all that time. I don’t want to marry a man and I don’t want to marry a woman, I’m already married to a leaky roof the size of Texas… and I’d like to be married to enough money to get it fixed, but I don’t look to government for my salvation. I recommend for marriage… that it be divorced from government and that it be taken out of politics… If the secular were separated from the sacred, the demagogues would have to find a new hobby horse.
After those speaking in favor of the resolution addressed the Council, Reverend Baity stood up to speak. Here's what he had to say:
This Constitutional amendment that we’re talking about this evening is necessary to give the people of North Carolina an opportunity to decide on marriage. Every major issue in our country – prayer, the bible… prayer at ball games, Roe v. Wade – all of those issues have been settled and ruled upon by the Judiciary. We believe that its time that the people of this country have the opportunity to make the final decision... We are asking the state of North Carolina to allow the people of this state the opportunity to decide what marriage is and we don’t think that’s asking too much. We think that the judiciary has made too many of these decisions for too long and that its time that the General Assembly to allow the people of the state of North Carolina to make that decision. I’m amazed how often it is said we have hate speech. That is not what we have. The truth of the matter is the Lord Jesus Christ said marriage was between one man and one woman… You can’t make anything else out of that. God had an urban renewal program for Sodom and Gomorrah because they were caught up in that, but that’s not the issue here this evening. The issue this evening is to allow the people of North Carolina the freedom to vote on what marriage really is and what it consists of… We believe it is time the legislators of the state of North Carolina allow the people of North Carolina the opportunity to decide what marriage is. Thank you.
The Council held their vote, with Raleigh York, Jr. making the motion to approve and Dwight Cornelison seconding. Five voted in favor, with one, Mrs. Maria Culbreth voting no.
After the vote I and three of those who spoke against the resolution rose to leave the room. I walked up to Reverend Baity in the rear of the room, shook his hand and thanked him for coming to the meeting in order to speak to the Council. He was, I must say, quite personable and respectful.
Here is the text of the entire resolution:
WHEREAS twenty states have had the opportunity to amend their state constitutions defining marriage, and on November 7, 2006, seven other states, including the following North Carolina border states, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia will have the opportunity to amend their state constitutions, and
WHEREAS the state of North Carolina is fortunate to have strong marriage laws in place, these laws are not immune from legal challenges, and
WHEREAS given the definition of marriage in North Carolina is statutory, they are open to challenge under North Carolina's Constitution, and
WHEREAS a constitutional amendment is the only way that the General Assembly and the people of North Carolina can protect our strong marriage laws and assure that the courts do not define the issue for the people; be it therefore
RESOLVED that the undersigned members of the Thomasville City Council ask the North Carolina General Assembly to allow the citizens of our state the same right that Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia and other states have exercised, the opportunity to amend our State Constitution to protect the institution of marriage in the state of North Carolina and define the type of marriage to be recognized as valid in our state.
You'll notice that the resolution doesn't openly state what it means. No where in the resolution will you find a mention of sexual orientation or same-sex relationships. This is what Barney Hill was speaking about when he noted the differences between this resolution and the one which failed, 4-3, at the Davidson County Board of Commissioners last year. There is no hiding the intent of this resolution. There is no hiding the intent of the amendment submitted to (and rightfully ignored by) the General Assembly for three years. The Reverend Baity's own statements to the Council concerning an "urban renewal plan for Sodom and Gomorrah" prove the intent of the proponents of this resolution and amendment.
An amendment to the North Carolina Constitution limiting marriage to one man and one woman is nothing but discrimination targetted squarely at gay and lesbian citizens of this state. The amendment's unintended consequences - the possibility of banning domestic partnerships or limiting legal contracts between unmarried individuals - would be extremely harmful to both gay and straight North Carolinians.
North Carolina has remained the ONLY Southern state to keep an anti-gay constitutional amendment off the ballot and I hope we remain the only Southern state with that well-deserved status.
Oh... and check this out. I had to drive up Route 109 to get back to Winston from Thomasville. Guess which church I had to pass on the way:
BlueNC is dedicated to freedom and fairness for the people of North Carolina. If you share that vision, welcome. If your intention is to disrupt our efforts, please find somewhere else to express your opinions.
Dumbed Down Politicos
Exile on Jones Street
Pam's House Blend
Public Policy Polling
Talking About Politics
Turn NC Blue