Upstream Media

Phone graphic from original Mother Jones articleI wouldn't ordinarily do a cut and paste job but an email I just received is worth sharing on BlueNC for a few reasons. It reinforces that what we do here scratching around in the dirt can have an impact and that we can bring to light issues that would otherwise be overlooked by mainstream media. In recent weeks BlueNC became aware of telemarketing push-polling and misleading robo-calling especially in NC-11. Some of that awareness came via Talkingpointsmemo.com and TPMmuckraker.com. I would like to tip the hat to TPM and to credit Mother Jones for originating the story especially as the original story highlighted the involvement of Texan Bob Perry who also flushed money down the toilet for Charles Taylor:

You might have seen the November 6, 2006 front page story in the New York Times by reporter Christopher Drew ("New Telemarketing Ploy Steers Voters on Republican Path"). It's worth a look, not just because it's an important story, and not just because Mother Jones helped break it about three weeks ago.        (More below the fold......)

About ten days before the Times' piece was published, Mother Jones I-Team Investigative Fellow Dan Schulman's October 26 story "Tales of a Pollster" looked at how ccAdvertising, a push poll company funded by Texan Robert Perry, who was also the money behind the Swiftboat attacks on John Kerry in 2004, used automated telemarketing to try to confuse Democratic and undecided voters and get them to stay away from the polls. You can see Schulman's story. Click below

Tales of a Push Pollster

Schulman's story in turn was cited by John Marshall's popular blog, Talkingpointsmemo.com a few days later, when they reported on how "push polling" was hitting campaigns in a half dozen states leading up to this week's elections.

The Times built their push-poll story, in turn, on the Mother Jones and Talkingpointsmemo reporting. Even though it didn't credit either of us, we're happy the New York Times decided to put it on their front page.

But just as importantly, this reveals how "news" gets made these days, and about how Mother Jones and independent media have an impact on the process. Fact is, someone else, Dan Schulman here at Mother Jones, and the staff at Talkingpointsmemo, did the heavy lifting for the Times' story.

Keep it coming people.

Graphic from the original Mother Jones article

Comments

TPMmuckraker

Back on Friday TPMmuckraker reviewed the robo-call issue with the post:
Did Nasty NRCC Robo Calls Win Elections?

As we did our best to document, the National Republican Congressional Committee was responsible for repetitive, often harrassing robo calls in more than two dozen districts across the country in the runup to the election.

In at least seven of those districts, the Democrat failed to unseat the incumbent by only a couple thousand votes. The NRCC's calls may have been the difference in those races.

We know this happened in NC-11 to little effect on the outcome and though no evidence of it in NC-08 robo-calling has affected several races nationwide.

NC-08 robocalls

My mom lives in Kannapolis and got at least one robo-call that started out with the telling "i'm calling with information about Larry Kissell..."

She hung up as soon as they got to the BS about increasing taxes. I'm sure there are others who listened.

At a 0.3% margin, I'm sure those calls had some effect.

Robin Hayes Hates Puppies

Thanks WFC

Change that to NEW evidence in NC-08. Maybe I'll go back to expenditures to see what matches up.

Really glad you posted this.

The good old butterfly effect ... we never if know if the thing we're doing is the thing that will make the difference that needs making.

Great article.

I called the NRCC days before the election and guess what...they weren't taking any calls. Also called Dole's main NC office to complain. They "hadn't heard about it" but returned the complaint saying the "Move-on" calls were robo-calls. To my knowledge, that's untrue. Anyway, hypocrisy in action.

Stan Bozarth