What does Speaker Tillis mean for reproductive freedom?
Cross-posted from Planned Parenthood of Central NC's blog, Choice 2.0.
Not even a month after the election, we’re getting closer to seeing exactly what that picture will look like when the Legislature convenes in January. In a (only slightly) surprising move yesterday, House Republicans voted Mecklenburg County legislator Thom Tillis as Speaker of the House.
This represents a surprising move in that Tillis beat out Minority Leader Skip Stam having held office for only four years. The not-so-surprising part is that he won his place as Speaker after having been credited with masterminding the Republican takeover of the General Assembly. First runner-up Stam was voted Majority Leader.
So what does this mean for reproductive freedom? According to the N&O: “Tillis’ selection as speaker may mean that some social issues won’t have the same priority they might have under Stam who, for instance, is a dogged abortion opponent.”
We can only hope that’s the case considering Tillis came out of the gate the morning after Election Day with this: “We’re a centrist state. We’re a small government, we’re a limited-government, free-market, stay-out of my-personal-life electorate.”
If that’s truly what soon-to-be Speaker Tillis believes then I sincerely hope that he’ll prove it by focusing on the issues that really matter to the state like jobs and education.
I have a sneaking suspicion, however, that limiting reproductive freedom may just have a special place on the “priority list of legislation that got nowhere under the Democrats“.
We’ll certainly be prepared for every last anti-choice bill that may be on that list. Let’s just hope that Tillis remembers his own advice from the day after Election Day as well as the fact that the independents that he appeals to do not like to re-elect candidates who actively restrict their reproductive freedom.







Tillis history
Tillis' co-sponsorship of four aggressively anti-choice bills (HBs 890, 891, 859 and 1044) during the 2009-10 session alone signals his active participation in the anti-choice movement.
Look for those and other similar bills to be revived and brought forward as priorities of the Republican House leadership.
Dan Besse
Other 'priorities' also of concern
Not so much a commentary on any particular legislative leader, but there are other issues of concern that might also become "priorities" when the legislature reconvenes in January. Among them are immigration and marriage. Dale Folwell spoke last week with The Winston-Salem Journal and briefly (and vaguely) discussed those topics and choice matters: http://ncequals.org/208/priorities-in-north-carolinas-legislature/
====
Matt Comer
New Media Coordinator, NC Equals
ncequals@gmail.com
http://ncequals.org
A grassroots movement of the Latin American Coalition building political power in North Carolina among immigrant, low-income and people of color communities.